Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859210›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

Identifying essential genes across eukaryotes by machine learning.

Thomas Beder, Olufemi Aromolaran, Jürgen Dönitz, Sofia Tapanelli, Eunice O Adedeji, Ezekiel Adebiyi, Gregor Bucher, Rainer Koenig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Inference of essential genes inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Inference of Essential Genes of the ParasiteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas BederIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Olufemi AromolaranDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-1714
Jürgen DönitzDepartment of Evolutionary Developmental Genetics, GZMB, University of Göttingen, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Sofia TapanelliDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Eunice O AdedejiCovenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Ezekiel AdebiyiDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Gregor BucherDepartment of Evolutionary Developmental Genetics, GZMB, University of Göttingen, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Rainer KoenigIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2051-7667

Funding

H3ABioNet: informatics solutions for H3AfricaU24HG006941 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MULDER, NICOLA · 2017 to 2021
$12.9M
WEST AFRICAN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION TRAINING IN BIOINFORMATICS RESEARCH (WASLITBRe)U2RTW010679 · FIC · COVENANT UNIVERSITY · PI ADEBIYI, EZEKIEL FEMI, AMOAKO-YIRENKYI, PETER · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
FIC NIH HHS U2R TW010679NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG006941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying essential genes on a genome scale is resource intensive and has been performed for only a few eukaryotes. For less studied organisms essentiality might be predicted by gene homology. However, this approach cannot be applied to non-conserved genes. Additionally, divergent essentiality information is obtained from studying single cells or whole, multi-cellular organisms, and particularly when derived from human cell line screens and human population studies. We employed machine learning across six model eukaryotes and 60 381 genes, using 41 635 features derived from the sequence, gene function information and network topology. Within a leave-one-organism-out cross-validation, the classifiers showed high generalizability with an average accuracy close to 80% in the left-out species. As a case study, we applied the method to

Identifiers

PMID34859210
PMCPMC8634067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.