Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021

Optimal Detection of Fusion Pore Dynamics Using Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy.

Joerg Nikolaus, Kasey Hancock, Maria Tsemperouli, David Baddeley, Erdem Karatekin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Fusion Pores as Regulators of Quantal Size and Cellular Physiology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joerg NikolausCellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Kasey HancockCellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Maria TsemperouliCellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
David BaddeleyNanobiology Institute, Yale University, West Haven, CT, United States.
Erdem KaratekinCellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Yale University · USInstitut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris · FR

Funding

Regulation of Photoreceptor NeurotransmisssionR01EY010542 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARATEKIN, ERDEM, THORESON, WALLACE B · 2001 to 2023
$7.7M
Nucleation and dynamics of exocytotic fusion poresR01NS113236 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KARATEKIN, ERDEM · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010542NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113236Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fusion pore is the initial narrow connection that forms between fusing membranes. During vesicular release of hormones or neurotransmitters, the nanometer-sized fusion pore may open-close repeatedly (flicker) before resealing or dilating irreversibly, leading to kiss-and-run or full-fusion events, respectively. Pore dynamics govern vesicle cargo release and the mode of vesicle recycling, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. This is partly due to a lack of reconstituted assays that combine single-pore sensitivity and high time resolution. Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy offers unique advantages for characterizing single membrane fusion events, but signals depend on effects that are difficult to disentangle, including the polarization of the excitation electric field, vesicle size, photobleaching, orientation of the excitation dipoles of the fluorophores with respect to the membrane, and the evanescent field depth. Commercial TIRF microscopes do not allow control of excitation polarization, further complicating analysis. To overcome these challenges, we built a polarization-controlled total internal reflection fluorescence (pTIRF) microscope and monitored fusion of proteoliposomes with planar lipid bilayers with single molecule sensitivity and ∼15 ms temporal resolution. Using pTIRF microscopy, we detected docking and fusion of fluorescently labeled small unilamellar vesicles, reconstituted with exocytotic/neuronal v-SNARE proteins (vSUVs), with a supported bilayer containing the cognate t-SNAREs (tSBL). By varying the excitation polarization angle, we were able to identify a dye-dependent optimal polarization at which the fluorescence increase upon fusion was maximal, facilitating event detection and analysis of lipid transfer kinetics. An improved algorithm allowed us to estimate the size of the fusing vSUV and the fusion pore openness (the fraction of time the pore is open) for every event. For most events, lipid transfer was much slower than expected for diffusion through an open pore, suggesting that fusion pore flickering limits lipid release. We find a weak correlation between fusion pore openness and vesicle area. The approach can be used to study mechanisms governing fusion pore dynamics in a wide range of membrane fusion processes.

Indexed as

fusion poreliposome-supported bilayer fusion assaymembrane fusionSNARE-mediated membrane fusiontotal internal reflection fluorescence microscopy

Identifiers

PMID34859048
PMCPMC8631473
OpenAlexW3212492693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.