Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858997›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Biophysical Stimuli as the Fourth Pillar of Bone Tissue Engineering.

Zhuowen Hao, Zhenhua Xu, Xuan Wang, Yi Wang, Hanke Li, Tianhong Chen, Yingkun Hu, Renxin Chen, Kegang Huang, Chao Chen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhuowen HaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Zhenhua XuDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xuan WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hanke LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tianhong ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yingkun HuDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Renxin ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Kegang HuangWuhan Institute of Proactive Health Management Science, Wuhan, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jingfeng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of critical bone defects remains challenging worldwide. Three canonical pillars (biomaterial scaffolds, bioactive molecules, and stem cells) of bone tissue engineering have been widely used for bone regeneration in separate or combined strategies, but the delivery of bioactive molecules has several obvious drawbacks. Biophysical stimuli have great potential to become the fourth pillar of bone tissue engineering, which can be categorized into three groups depending on their physical properties: internal structural stimuli, external mechanical stimuli, and electromagnetic stimuli. In this review, distinctive biophysical stimuli coupled with their osteoinductive windows or parameters are initially presented to induce the osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Then, osteoinductive mechanisms of biophysical transduction (a combination of mechanotransduction and electrocoupling) are reviewed to direct the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. These mechanisms include biophysical sensing, transmission, and regulation. Furthermore, distinctive application strategies of biophysical stimuli are presented for bone tissue engineering, including predesigned biomaterials, tissue-engineered bone grafts, and postoperative biophysical stimuli loading strategies. Finally, ongoing challenges and future perspectives are discussed.

Indexed as

biophysical stimulibiophysical transductionmesenchymal stem cellsosteogenesisosteoinductive mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID34858997
PMCPMC8630705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.