Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

A Multicenter Single-Arm Objective Performance Criteria Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation as Primary Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Study Protocol.

Bi-Ming He, Wei Xue, Wei-Gang Yan, Lei Yin, Bai-Jun Dong, Zhi-En Zhou, Heng-Zhi Lin, Yi Zhou, Yan-Qing Wang, Zhen-Kai Shi and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03838432 (The Efficacy and Safety of Composite Steep-pulse), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03838432 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation) Treatment Apparatus Used in Prostate Cancer Ablation Therapy : a Multicenter, Single-arm, Objective Performance Criteria Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Military Medical UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled119ConditionsProstate CancerArmsSteep Pulse Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bi-Ming HeDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Wei XueDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Gang YanDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lei YinDepartment of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bai-Jun DongDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-En ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Heng-Zhi LinDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan-Qing WangDepartment of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhen-Kai ShiDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hai ZhouDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shuai-Dong WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shan-Cheng RenDepartment of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xu GaoDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lin-Hui WangDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Chuan-Liang XuDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Feng WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Changhai Hospital · CNShanghai East Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNRenji Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe classical pathway for the therapy of low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer is radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, which has shown a high incidence of complications, including erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and bowel injury. An alternative pathway is to perform an ablation by some energy to the localized lesion, known as focal therapy. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is nonthermal energy that can be used in cancer ablation to deliver pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane and to invoke cell death. An H-FIRE pathway has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicenter and single-arm objective performance criteria (OPC) study, in which all men with localized prostate cancer are allocated to H-FIRE ablation. This trial will assess the efficacy and safety of the H-FIRE ablation for prostate cancer. Efficacy will be assessed by prostate biopsy 6 months after treatment while safety will be assessed by adverse event reports and questionnaires. The main inclusion criteria are moderate to low-risk prostate cancer in NCCN risk classification and had no previous therapy for prostate cancer. A sample size of 110 participants is required. The primary objective is to determine whether the detection rate of clinically significant cancer by prostate biopsy is less than 20% after the H-FIRE ablation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has obtained ethical approval by the ethics committee of all participating centers. The results of the study will be submitted for dissemination and publication in peer-reviewed journals.

conclusionsThis multicenter single-arm objective performance criteria trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of high-frequency irreversible electroporation in treating prostate cancer. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: A comprehensive evaluation of imaging and histopathology is used to determine the effect of treatment. Questionnaires were used to assess the treatment side effects. Multicenter and pragmatic designs capacitate higher generalizability. A limitation of this trial is that the prostate biopsy as an endpoint may not be as accurate as of the specimen from prostate prostatectomy. Another limitation is the 6-month follow-up time, making this trial challenging to come to firm conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of IRE in the long term. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03838432.

Indexed as

clinical trialH-FIRE = High-frequency irreversible electroporationmulticenter analysisprostate cancerprotocol

Identifiers

PMID34858837
PMCPMC8631513
OpenAlexW3211727738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.