Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858825›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Dose Prediction Using a Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Tomotherapy.

Yaoying Liu, Zhaocai Chen, Jinyuan Wang, Xiaoshen Wang, Baolin Qu, Lin Ma, Wei Zhao, Gaolong Zhang, Shouping Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nested CNN architecture for three-dimensional dose distribution prediction in tomotherapy for prostate cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaoying LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhaocai ChenManteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, China.
Jinyuan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoshen WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Baolin QuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhaoSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Gaolong ZhangSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Shouping XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
People's Liberation Army No. 150 Hospital · CNBeihang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study focused on predicting 3D dose distribution at high precision and generated the prediction methods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (NPC) treated with Tomotherapy based on the patient-specific gap between organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volumes (PTVs).

methodsA convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained using the CT and contour masks as the input and dose distributions as output. The CNN is based on the "3D Dense-U-Net", which combines the U-Net and the Dense-Net. To evaluate the model, we retrospectively used 124 NPC patients treated with Tomotherapy, in which 96 and 28 patients were randomly split and used for model training and test, respectively. We performed comparison studies using different training matrix shapes and dimensions for the CNN models, i.e., 128 ×128 ×48 (for Model I), 128 ×128 ×16 (for Model II), and 2D Dense U-Net (for Model III). The performance of these models was quantitatively evaluated using clinically relevant metrics and statistical analysis.

resultsWe found a more considerable height of the training patch size yields a better model outcome. The study calculated the corresponding errors by comparing the predicted dose with the ground truth. The mean deviations from the mean and maximum doses of PTVs and OARs were 2.42 and 2.93%. Error for the maximum dose of right optic nerves in Model I was 4.87 ± 6.88%, compared with 7.9 ± 6.8% in Model II (

conclusionsIt is significant to train the dose prediction model by exploiting deep-learning techniques with various clinical logic concepts. Increasing the height (Y direction) of training patch size can improve the dose prediction accuracy of tiny OARs and the whole body. Our dose prediction network model provides a clinically acceptable result and a training strategy for a dose prediction model. It should be helpful to build automatic Tomotherapy planning.

Indexed as

deep learningdose predictionnasopharyngeal carcinomaradiotherapy planTomotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34858825
PMCPMC8631763
OpenAlexW3213608209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.