Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858820›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Cost-Effectiveness of Ipilimumab Plus Anti-PD-1 Therapy

Ye Peng, Xiaohui Zeng, Liubao Peng, Qiao Liu, Lidan Yi, Xia Luo, Sini Li, Liting Wang, Shuxia Qin, Xiaomin Wan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ye PengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaohui ZengPET-CT Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liubao PengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiao LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lidan YiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xia LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Sini LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liting WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shuxia QinDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaomin WanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chongqing TanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe use of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 has recently been shown to significantly improve the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in this population from the US payer perspective. MATERIALS AND

methodsA Markov model was created based on a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic melanoma who were resistant to anti-PD-(L)1. Cost information was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and literature-based costs. The utility value was derived from the published literature. The results of the model was the total cost, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The uncertainty of the model was addressed through sensitivity analysis. In addition, we also conducted subgroup analysis.

resultsIpilimumab plus anti-PD-1 provided an improvement of 1.39 QALYs and 2.48 LYs, at a ICER of $73,163 per QALY. The HR of OS was the variable that had the greatest impact on ICER. Compared to ipilimumab, the probability of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 being cost-effective was 94% at the WTP of $150,000/QALY. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the ICER in the majority of the subgroups was less than $150,000/QALY.

conclusionsIpilimumab plus anti-PD-1 was likely to be cost-effective compared to ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 at a WTP threshold of 150,000/QALY.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessipilimumab plus anti-PD-1Markov modelmelanomaretrospective analysis

Identifiers

PMID34858820
PMCPMC8630699
OpenAlexW3214233641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.