ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2021
Evaluation of femoral malrotation after intramedullary nailing.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is the rate and degree of deformity in femoral diaphyseal nonunion? A CT-based retrospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Incidence and Functional Impact of Malrotation after Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Prospective Computed Tomography-based Observational Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntramedullary nailing and closed reduction are one of the most important treatment strategies for femoral shaft fractures. Malrotation in the femoral shaft is a complication that requires exact investigations. Here we aimed to evaluate and report the outcomes of malrotation of femur in patients with femoral shaft fractures following antegrade intramedullary nailing.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 140 patients who had referred to Shahid-Beheshti Hospital in Abadan, Iran and had undergone antegrade intramedullary fixation for isolated femoral shaft fracture during a 6-year period from 2015 to 2021 were enrolled. Demographic information and disease-related information were collected. During operation, the patients were assessed clinically for malrotation of femur with 90° of the knee flection and with the hip in 0° flexion and then in the postoperative follow-up period, the patient was examined again and a computed tomography scan requested to identify the degree of malrotation of femur and the observers were unaware of the CT scan result at the time of the clinical examination. We also measured the amount of internal and external rotation while the patient in the lying supine position with 90° flexion in the knee and hip joint and lying prone position with hip extension. In CT imaging to determine the amount of malrotation of femur, the angle between a line drawn across the two femoral condyles in the posterior aspect and the femoral neck shows the amount of rotation.
resultsDegree of rotational deformity, less than 5°, 5 to 10° and 10 to 15° was less than 8.6%, 75.7% and 15.7% respectively and did not relate to age, sex, fracture location and activity of the patients (P>0.05). There was a strong linear correlation with the average predictive power between clinically detected torsional deformity in comparison with the CT detected torsional deformity (r=0.333 and P=0.005), which was stronger in women than men (r=0.336 in men and r=0.659 in women) (P<0.05). There was a strong linear correlation with the average predictive power between clinically detected torsional deformity in comparison with the CT detected torsional deformity was observed only in external malrotation of femur (r=0.541 and P=0.001). A poor inverse linear relationship was observed between clinically detected and CT detected torsional deformity with the age of the patients which the correlation of clinically detected was more than the CT detected (r in clinical examination =-0.285 and r in CT measurement =-0.246) (P<0.05).
conclusionIn this study, there was no femoral malrotation over 15° that was associated with clinical symptoms. However, a CT scan should be performed for accurate diagnosis and necessary measures but it does not seem necessary to perform in all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34858723PMC8610817W3215549919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.