Trial reportJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Machine Learning-Based Gynecologic Tumor Diagnosis and Its Postoperative Incisional Infection Influence Factor Analysis.
Trial report in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Retracted: Machine Learning-Based Gynecologic Tumor Diagnosis and Its Postoperative Incisional Infection Influence Factor Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various factors influencing postoperative incisional infection in gynecologic tumors were analyzed, and the value of quality nursing intervention was studied. In this study, 74 surgically treated gynecologic tumor patients were randomly selected from within the hospital as the study population and were divided into study and control groups. For this purpose, the whole-group random sampling method is utilized to compare the postoperative incisional infection rates of the two groups, analyze their influencing factors, and develop quality nursing interventions. In this paper, a breast cancer diagnosis prediction model was developed by combining the self-attentive mechanism. The preprocessing work such as data quantification and normalization was performed first which is followed by adding the preprocessed data to the self-attentive mechanism. This model has solved the problem that recurrent neural networks (RNNs) could not extract and calculate the features at the same time. Likewise, it has solved the drawback that the RNN could not consider global features at the same time when extracting the features, and then, the feature matrix extracted by the self-attentive mechanism was added to the adaptive neural network. The adaptive neural network model for breast cancer diagnosis prediction was constructed and, finally, relevant parameters of the adaptive neural network model were adjusted according to different tasks to make the model performance optimal. Experimental results showed that the postoperative incision infection rate of patients in the study group was 2.70%, which was significantly lower than that of 21.62% in the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.