Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858530›Full record

ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2021

Histological and radiographic evaluation of three common tendon transfer techniques in an un-ossified bone porcine model: implications for early anterior tibialis tendon transfers in children with clubfeet.

Kyle Korth, Scott Bolam, Ellen Leiferman, Thomas Crenshaw, Michael Dray, Haemish A Crawford, Maegen Wallace, Matthew A Halanski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alternative Methods of Fixation for Anterior Tibialis Transfer in Residual Clubfoot Deformity.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle KorthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Scott BolamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ellen LeifermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Thomas CrenshawDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-0264
Michael DrayHistology Department, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Haemish A CrawfordDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Starship Children's Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Maegen WallaceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-9412
Matthew A HalanskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USAuckland City Hospital · NZChildren's Hospital & Medical Center · USStarship Children's Health · NZUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USWaikato Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the histological healing and radiographic effects of tendons transferred to ossified or unossified bone using different tendon fixation techniques.

methodsNine new-born piglets underwent bilateral tendon transfers to either the ossified boney calcaneal body or unossified apophysis. The tendons were fixed using metallic suture anchors, sutures alone or a bone tunnel. At six weeks of age, calcanei were harvested, radiologically imaged and then prepared for histology. A semi-quantitative aggregated scoring system with values ranging from 0 (poor) to 15 (excellent), was used to grade healing at the surgical enthesis and the apophyseal ossification was graded by five independent reviewers in triplicate using a modified (1 to 4) validated scoring system.

resultsHistologically, the cartilaginous transfers utilizing the tunnel and suture techniques also demonstrated the best average aggregated scores of entheses healing rivalling that measured in transfers using the classic bone tunnel technique (clinical benchmark), whereas suture anchor fixation demonstrated the worst healing in both the ossified and unossified samples. All three transfer techniques caused at least minor alterations in apophyseal ossification, with the most significant changes observed in the metallic suture anchor cohort. The tunnel and suture techniques demonstrated similar and more mild abnormalities in ossification.

conclusionTendon transfers to unossified bone heal histologically as well as transfers classically performed through tunnels in bone. Suture fixation or tunnel techniques appear radiographically and histologically superior to suture anchors in our newborn porcine model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Indexed as

animal modelcartilageclubfoottendon transfer

Identifiers

PMID34858530
PMCPMC8582610
OpenAlexW3197509801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.