ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2021
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: What Have We Achieved and Where Are We Now? Follow-up to the 2015 Lorentz Workshop.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the economic burden and health-related quality of life in chinese patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a questionnaire survey analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Challenges in the diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva with the ACVR1 mutation (c.774G > C, p.R258S): a case report and review of literature.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Disturbed glycolipid metabolism activates CXCL13-CXCR5 axis in senescent TSCs to promote heterotopic ossification.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Oxidative phosphorylation is a pivotal therapeutic target of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy vs robot-assisted transaxillary thryoidectomy: analisys and comparison of safety and outcomes.Updates in surgery · 2024Observational
- Performance of simplified methods for quantification of [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Mimics Generalized Dystonia Disorder: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Review
- Mast Cell Involvement in the Pathogenesis of Selected Musculoskeletal Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Novel Therapeutic Targets for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Emerging Strategies and Future Directions.Cureus · 2023Review
- Intra-abdominal myositis ossificans - a clinically challenging disease: A case report.World journal of orthopedics · 2023Article
- Aggressive atraumatic myositis ossificans in a toddler.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of the Evidence of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Differentiation to Fibroblasts.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Gene Therapy for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Feasibility and Obstacles.Human gene therapy · 2022Review
- SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immune responses to BNT162b2 vaccine in Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Monitoring and Management of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Current Perspectives.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2022Review
- Editorial: Innovative Models in Bone Biology: What can be Learned From Rare Bone Diseases?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare progressive genetic disease effecting one in a million individuals. During their life, patients with FOP progressively develop bone in the soft tissues resulting in increasing immobility and early death. A mutation in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.