Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34858264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.

Christian Panitz, Dominik Endres, Merle Buchholz, Zahra Khosrowtaj, Matthias F J Sperl, Erik M Mueller, Anna Schubö, Alexander C Schütz, Sarah Teige-Mocigemba, Martin Pinquart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Cognitive Behavior Therapy.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian PanitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Dominik EndresDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Merle BuchholzDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Zahra KhosrowtajDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Matthias F J SperlDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Erik M MuellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Anna SchuböDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Alexander C SchützDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sarah Teige-MocigembaDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Martin PinquartDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectations are probabilistic beliefs about the future that shape and influence our perception, affect, cognition, and behavior in many contexts. This makes expectations a highly relevant concept across basic and applied psychological disciplines. When expectations are confirmed or violated, individuals can respond by either updating or maintaining their prior expectations in light of the new evidence. Moreover, proactive and reactive behavior can change the probability with which individuals encounter expectation confirmations or violations. The investigation of predictors and mechanisms underlying expectation update and maintenance has been approached from many research perspectives. However, in many instances there has been little exchange between different research fields. To further advance research on expectations and expectation violations, collaborative efforts across different disciplines in psychology, cognitive (neuro)science, and other life sciences are warranted. For fostering and facilitating such efforts, we introduce the ViolEx 2.0 model, a revised framework for interdisciplinary research on cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of expectation update and maintenance in the context of expectation violations. To support different goals and stages in interdisciplinary exchange, the ViolEx 2.0 model features three model levels with varying degrees of specificity in order to address questions about the research synopsis, central concepts, or functional processes and relationships, respectively. The framework can be applied to different research fields and has high potential for guiding collaborative research efforts in expectation research.

Indexed as

expectation changeexpectation maintenanceexpectation persistenceexpectationsexpectation updateexpectation violationprediction errorViolEx model

Identifiers

PMID34858264
PMCPMC8632008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.