SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2021
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Burnout Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06460285 (CalmER Intervention Trial for Healthcare Workers With Anxiety), which is not on this map. Cited by 170 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CalmER Intervention Trial for Healthcare Workers With Anxiety
Who cites it
170 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence and risk factors of burnout symptoms among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Human resources for health · 2025Pooled it
- Indicators associated with job morale of physicians in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID- 19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- What is the State of Organisational Compassion-Based Interventions Targeting to Improve Health Professionals' Well-Being? Results of a Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- The Pooled Prevalence of Attributed Factors of Suicide in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- The Prevalence and Determinants of Mental Health Problems in Lebanon: A Meta-Analytic Study of 3957 Healthcare Workers.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Nurses' occupational fatigue level and risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Burnout scales used in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their psychometric properties: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Global Rate of Willingness to Volunteer Among Medical and Health Students During Pandemic: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Individual-Based Strategies to Reduce Nurse Burnout: An Umbrella Review.Journal of nursing management · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of standardized mindfulness programs on burnout: a systematic review and original analysis from randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Art therapy-based interventions to address burnout and psychosocial distress in healthcare workers-a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence.PLoS medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence of Burnout among Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta analysis on burnout in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hidden healthcare crisis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- A randomized controlled trial investigating digital resilience training for healthcare professionals.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Feasibility and effectiveness of the mindfulness-based stress reduction programs on relieving burnout of healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot randomized controlled trial in China.Human resources for health · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Outcome assessment of a complex mental health intervention in the workplace. Results from the MENTUPP pilot study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023Trial
- Tiny HabitsFrontiers in public health · 2022Trial
110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burnout among healthcare personnel has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic's unique features. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a complete assessment of the prevalence of burnout across various healthcare personnel. Until January 2021, systematic searches for English language papers were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest. Thirty observational studies were found after conducting systematic searches. The pooled overall prevalence of burnout was 52% [95% confidence interval (CI) 40-63%]. Pooled emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and lack of personal accomplishment (PA) were 51% (95% CI 42-61%), 52% (95% CI 39-65%), and 28% (95% CI 25-31%), respectively. This study demonstrated that nearly half of the healthcare workers experienced burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the studies that were included, non-frontline COVID-19 exposed healthcare personnel also experienced burnout. From high to lower middle-income countries, there was a gradient in the prevalence of total burnout, EE, and lack of PA. Further studies on burnout in low and lower-middle-income countries are suggested. A uniform diagnostic tool for the assessment of burnout is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.