Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34857867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Systematic optimization of visible light-induced crosslinking conditions of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA).

Sina Sharifi, Hannah Sharifi, Ali Akbari, James Chodosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sina SharifiDisruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Sina_sharifi@meei.harvard.edu.
Hannah SharifiDisruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ali AkbariSolid Tumor Research Center, Research Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
James ChodoshDisruptive Technology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUrmia University of Medical Sciences

Funding

Generation of suturable artificial cornea from the integration of exfoliated graphene with gelatin glycidyl methacrylateK99EY030553 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SHARIFI, SINA · 2020 to 2022
$242k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY030553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) is one of the most widely used photo-crosslinkable biopolymers in tissue engineering. In in presence of an appropriate photoinitiator, the light activation triggers the crosslinking process, which provides shape fidelity and stability at physiological temperature. Although ultraviolet (UV) has been extensively explored for photo-crosslinking, its application has been linked to numerous biosafety concerns, originated from UV phototoxicity. Eosin Y, in combination with TEOA and VC, is a biosafe photoinitiation system that can be activated via visible light instead of UV and bypasses those biosafety concerns; however, the crosslinking system needs fine-tuning and optimization. In order to systematically optimize the crosslinking conditions, we herein independently varied the concentrations of Eosin Y [(EY)], triethanolamine (TEOA), vinyl caprolactam (VC), GelMA precursor, and crosslinking times and assessed the effect of those parameters on the properties the hydrogel. Our data showed that except EY, which exhibited an optimal concentration (~ 0.05 mM), increasing [TEOA], [VA], [GelMA], or crosslinking time improved mechanical (tensile strength/modulus and compressive modulus), adhesion (lap shear strength), swelling, biodegradation properties of the hydrogel. However, increasing the concentrations of crosslinking reagents ([TEOA], [VA], [GelMA]) reduced cell viability in 3-dimensional (3D) cell culture. This study enabled us to optimize the crosslinking conditions to improve the properties of the GelMA hydrogel and to generate a library of hydrogels with defined properties essential for different biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Cross-Linking ReagentsGelatinLightMethacrylatesCaprolactamCells, CulturedCell SurvivalEosine Yellowish-(YS)EthanolaminesHydrogelsTemperatureTissue EngineeringUltraviolet RaysCaprolactamCross-Linking ReagentsEosine Yellowish-(YS)EthanolaminesGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylatestriethanolamine

Identifiers

PMID34857867
PMCPMC8640009
OpenAlexW3215221332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.