Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34857568›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Validating machine learning models for the prediction of labour induction intervention using routine data: a registry-based retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania.

Clifford Silver Tarimo, Soumitra S Bhuyan, Quanman Li, Michael Johnson J Mahande, Jian Wu, Xiaoli Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clifford Silver TarimoCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0672-9471
Soumitra S BhuyanSchool of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New York, New York, USA.
Quanman LiCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Michael Johnson J MahandeInstitute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania, United Republic of.ORCID 0000-0002-7750-7657
Jian WuCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoli FuCollege of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China xlfu66@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed at identifying the important variables for labour induction intervention and assessing the predictive performance of machine learning algorithms.

settingWe analysed the birth registry data from a referral hospital in northern Tanzania. Since July 2000, every birth at this facility has been recorded in a specific database.

participants21 578 deliveries between 2000 and 2015 were included. Deliveries that lacked information regarding the labour induction status were excluded. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Deliveries involving labour induction intervention.

resultsParity, maternal age, body mass index, gestational age and birth weight were all found to be important predictors of labour induction. Boosting method demonstrated the best discriminative performance (area under curve, AUC=0.75: 95% CI (0.73 to 0.76)) while logistic regression presented the least (AUC=0.71: 95% CI (0.70 to 0.73)). Random forest and boosting algorithms showed the highest net-benefits as per the decision curve analysis.

conclusionAll of the machine learning algorithms performed well in predicting the likelihood of labour induction intervention. Further optimisation of these classifiers through hyperparameter tuning may result in an improved performance. Extensive research into the performance of other classifier algorithms is warranted.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedMachine LearningFemaleHumansPregnancyRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTanzaniaTertiary Care Centersepidemiologygynaecologyhealth informaticsobstetricspaediatricspublic health

Identifiers

PMID34857568
PMCPMC8647548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.