Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34857065›Full record

Observational studyEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2021

Immunoglobulin (Ig)A seropositivity against SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers in Israel, 4 April to 13 July 2020: an observational study.

Yaniv Lustig, Carmit Cohen, Asaf Biber, Hanaa Jaber, Yael Becker Ilany, Victoria Indenbaum, Sharon Amit, Michal Mandelboim, Ella Mendelson, Gili Regev-Yochay

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yaniv LustigCentral Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Carmit CohenInfection Prevention & Control Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Asaf BiberSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Hanaa JaberInfection Prevention & Control Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Yael Becker IlanyInfection Prevention & Control Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Victoria IndenbaumCentral Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Sharon AmitMicrobiology Laboratory, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Michal MandelboimCentral Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Ella MendelsonCentral Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Gili Regev-YochaySackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · ILIsrael Ministry of Health · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has put healthcare workers (HCW) at significant risk. Presence of antibodies can confirm prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.AimThis study investigates the prevalence of IgA and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in HCW.MethodsPerformance of IgA and IgG antibody ELISA assays were initially evaluated in positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 serum samples. IgA and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured in 428 asymptomatic HCW. We assessed the risk of two groups: HCW with high exposure risk outside work (HROW) residing in areas where COVID-19 was endemic (n = 162) and HCW with high exposure risk at work (HRAW) in a COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 97).ResultsSensitivities of 80% and 81.2% and specificities of 97.2% and 98% were observed for IgA and IgG antibodies, respectively. Of the 428 HCW, three were positive for IgG and 27 for IgA. Only 3/27 (11%) IgA-positive HCW had IgG antibodies compared with 50/62 (81%) in a group of previous SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive individuals. Consecutive samples from IgA-positive HCW demonstrated IgA persistence 18-83 days in 12/20 samples and IgG seroconversion in 1/20 samples. IgA antibodies were present in 8.6% of HROW and 2% of HRAW.ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 exposure may lead to asymptomatic transient IgA response without IgG seroconversion. The significance of these findings needs further study. Out of work exposure is a possible risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCW and infection in HCW can be controlled if adequate protective equipment is implemented.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin AIsraelPandemicsAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin ACOVID-19ELISAhealthcare workersIgASARS-CoV-2serosurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34857065
PMCPMC8641069
OpenAlexW3217468225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.