Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856970›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of impacts of the Covid-19-pandemic on outpatient care in rural areas: a qualitative study.

Madlen Hoerold, Marc Gottschalk, Carla Maria Debbeler, Heike Heytens, Saskia Ehrentreich, Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus, Christian Apfelbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madlen HoeroldInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. madlen.hoerold@med.ovgu.de.
Marc GottschalkUniversity Clinic for Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Carla Maria DebbelerInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Heike HeytensInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Saskia EhrentreichInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ruediger C Braun-DullaeusUniversity Clinic for Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian ApfelbacherInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasures to manage the COVID-19 pandemic have led to impacts on healthcare systems and providers worldwide. Outpatient healthcare professionals (HCPs) provide the majority of patient care. Insight into their experiences during a pandemic is rare. Therefore, we explored how primary and secondary care HCPs in a rural area in Germany experienced their work during the pandemic and what health-related outcomes they perceived in their patients. In this context, we also examined the impact on access to and utilization of healthcare and working conditions.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative interview study with outpatient HCPs. We recruited by e-mail, telephone, professional networks and personal contacts. Data were collected between August 2020 and January 2021. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsOur sample consisted of 28 HCPs (15 family physicians, 7 cardiologists, and 6 non-physician assistants, 12 female) from Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. HCPs experienced fewer consultations as well as cancellations by hospitals and secondary care physicians, especially at the beginning of the Covid-19-pandemic, while they continued throughout to provide outpatient care. They quickly adopted changes in practice organisation and healthcare provision. There was a shift towards telephone consultations, home visits as well as unconventional consultations e.g. through the practice window. Family physicians used personal relationships to support utilization of healthcare and to avoid health-related effects. Social tension and burden seemed to interact with a perceived lack of preparedness, the pandemic-related changes in their working condition as well as access to and utilization of healthcare. Chronic disease monitoring was postponed, which could have consequences in the course of disease of patients. HCPs experienced effects on patients' psychological well-being.

conclusionOur study demonstrates the impacts of Covid-19-pandemic on outpatient care in rural areas and emphasizes its importance. HCPs experienced impacts on access to and utilization of healthcare, working conditions and health-related outcomes. Health policy should create a framework for healthcare to support outpatient care in rural areas with a looming undersupply of primary and secondary care in order to maintain healthcare and reduce pandemic impacts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ambulatory CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CardiologistsContent analysisFamily physiciansGermanyHealthcare

Identifiers

PMID34856970
PMCPMC8638652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.