Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856952›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

A seven-year analysis of the role and impact of a free community eye clinic.

Lucas W Rowe, Melanie Scheive, Hanna L Tso, Patrick Wurster, Nicholas E Kalafatis, David A Camp, Avrey Thau, Chi Wah Rudy Yung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobile Eye Units in the United States and Canada: A Narrative Review of Structures, Services and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas W RoweDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Melanie ScheiveDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Hanna L TsoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Patrick WursterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nicholas E KalafatisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
David A CampDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Avrey ThauDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Chi Wah Rudy YungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. ryung@iupui.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Indiana University Student Outreach Clinic (IUSOC) Eye Clinic is a monthly student-run eye clinic that provides free visual screening to the Near East Side community of Indianapolis, IN, USA. Screening includes assessments of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, peripheral visual fields, refraction, and non-mydriatic fundus photography.

methodsThis is a retrospective chart review of 875 patients seen at the IUSOC Eye Clinic from October 2013 to February 2020. Data on demographics, insurance coverage, ocular history, physical examination, suspected diagnosis, referral status, and glasses provided were collected and analyzed.

results875 patients were seen at the IUSOC Eye Clinic from October 2013 to February 2020. 39.2% of the patients seen at the clinic reported being uninsured. 61.4% of patients were found to have visual acuity of 20/40 or worse, while 51.3% of patients were found to have a near visual acuity of 20/40 or worse. 20.3% of patients were referred to the local county hospital for further evaluation by an ophthalmologist, 14.4% of patients received free glasses prescriptions, and 27.9% of patients received free reading glasses. Common reasons for referral for further ophthalmology evaluation included glaucoma, decreased visual acuity, and diabetic retinopathy. An estimated value of services provided over the seven years of the clinic was 1271 relative value units.

conclusionThe IUSOC Eye Clinic fills an important role in advancing ocular health and preventing irreversible blindness in an underserved Indianapolis community. Additionally, the clinic demonstrates an educational model for involving medical student volunteers.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyEye DiseasesHumansPhotographyRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityFree clinicUrban healthVision screeningVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID34856952
PMCPMC8636581
OpenAlexW3216934353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.