Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856819›Full record

ReviewVeterinary pathology2022

Hamster models of COVID-19 pneumonia reviewed: How human can they be?

Achim D Gruber, Theresa C Firsching, Jakob Trimpert, Kristina Dietert

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Viruses · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Achim D GruberFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4502-0393
Theresa C FirschingFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1378-4951
Jakob TrimpertFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kristina DietertFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5667-6750
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dramatic global consequences of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic soon fueled quests for a suitable model that would facilitate the development and testing of therapies and vaccines. In contrast to other rodents, hamsters are naturally susceptible to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the Syrian hamster (

Indexed as

COVID-19AnimalsCricetinaeDisease Models, AnimalHumansLungMesocricetusMicePandemicsRespiratory SystemSARS-CoV-2animal modelCOVID-19hamsterhistopathologypathologypreclinical researchreviewsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34856819
PMCPMC9207993
OpenAlexW3214990850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.