Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856647›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

How paediatric departments in Sweden facilitate giving children a voice on their experiences of healthcare: A cross-sectional study.

Anna Nordlind, Ann-Sofie Sundqvist, Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson, Ann-Charlotte Almblad, Karin Ängeby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. How paediatric departments in Sweden facilitate giving children a voice on their experiences of healthcare: A cross-sectional study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna NordlindFaculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6325-920X
Ann-Sofie SundqvistFaculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-6145
Agneta Anderzén-CarlssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-8234
Ann-Charlotte AlmbladDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-5492
Karin ÄngebyCentre for Clinical Research, Region Värmland, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-7912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn January 2020, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child was incorporated into Swedish law. According to Swedish regulations, patients are to be given the opportunity to participate in quality improvement. Sometimes, the patients are children who have the right to be heard on matters concerning them, such as their experience of a hospital visit.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe how Swedish paediatric departments facilitate children's voices on their healthcare experiences and how their perspectives are taken into account in quality improvement work.

methodsThis study has a descriptive cross-sectional design. Data were collected using a study-specific survey sent by e-mail to all the heads of the paediatric departments in Sweden, with both inpatient and outpatient care. The response rate was 74% (28 of 38 departments).

resultsThe results demonstrated a variation in questionnaires used and to whom they were targeted; less than half of the participating departments reported having had questionnaires aimed at children. The results also indicated a major variation in other working methods used to allow children to voice their experiences in Swedish paediatric departments. The results indicate that the national co-ordination in facilitating the children's rights to be heard on their experiences in healthcare organisations can be improved.

conclusionFurther research is required to ascertain which method is the most practically effective in paediatric departments, in what way children prefer to be heard regarding their experience of and perspectives on healthcare, and what questions need to be asked. A validated national patient-reported experience measure developed with and aimed at children could provide them with equal opportunities to voice their experiences in healthcare, regardless of their diagnoses or which paediatric department they visit.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHospital DepartmentsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyHumansSwedenpaediatric careparticipationpatient-reported experience measurequality improvement worksurveySweden

Identifiers

PMID34856647
PMCPMC8849245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.