Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856223›Full record

SynthesisNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2022

Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention.

Meaghan V Perdue, Kelly Mahaffy, Katherine Vlahcevic, Emma Wolfman, Florina Erbeli, Fabio Richlan, Nicole Landi

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reaching Students with Reading Disabilities During the Summer.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Meaghan V PerdueDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA; Dept. of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Electronic address: meaghan.perdue@ucalgary.ca.
Kelly MahaffyDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
Katherine VlahcevicDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
Emma WolfmanDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Florina ErbeliDept. of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Fabio RichlanCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience & Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Nicole LandiDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
Haskins Laboratories · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRIS W SCHATSCHNEIDER · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
Effectiveness and predictors of response for a technology-based reading intervention in the homeR01HD101842 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI LANDI, NICOLE, MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
Training in the Cognitive Neuroscience of CommunicationT32DC017703 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Inge-Marie Eigsti, Emily B Myers · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101842NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC017703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral research supports the efficacy of intervention for reading disability, but the brain mechanisms underlying improvement in reading are not well understood. Here, we review 39 neuroimaging studies of reading intervention to characterize links between reading improvement and changes in the brain. We report evidence of changes in activation, connectivity, and structure within the reading network, and right hemisphere, frontal and sub-cortical regions. Our meta-analysis of changes in brain activation from pre- to post- reading intervention in eight studies did not yield any significant effects. Methodological heterogeneity among studies may contribute to the lack of significant meta-analytic findings. Based on our qualitative synthesis, we propose that brain changes in response to intervention should be considered in terms of interactions among distributed cognitive, linguistic and sensory systems, rather than via a "normalized" vs. "compensatory" dichotomy. Further empirical research is needed to identify effects of moderating factors such as features of intervention programs, neuroimaging tasks, and individual differences among participants.

Indexed as

Brain MappingDyslexiaBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronal PlasticityDyslexiafMRIMeta-analysisNeuroimagingReading disabilityReading interventionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34856223
PMCPMC10327490
OpenAlexW3217064285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.