Direction selectivity in retinal bipolar cell axon terminals.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Retinal ganglion cells encode the direction of motion outside their classical receptive field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
   Article
2. A presynaptic source drives differing levels of surround suppression in two mouse retinal ganglion cell types.Nature communications · 2024
   Article
3. Heterogeneous presynaptic receptive fields contribute to directional tuning in starburst amacrine cells.eLife · 2023
   Article
4. Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection.iScience · 2023
   Article
5. Realistic retinal modeling unravels the differential role of excitation and inhibition to starburst amacrine cells in direction selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Direction selectivity in retinal bipolar cell axon terminals.2021

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.