Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856044›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Development and field testing of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for adults newly diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Yumi Aoki, Takashi Tsuboi, Yoshikazu Takaesu, Koichiro Watanabe, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Yasuhito Kinoshita, Mami Kayama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and field testing of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for adults newly diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yumi AokiGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2674-0707
Takashi TsuboiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikazu TakaesuDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichiro WatanabeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro NakayamaGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhito KinoshitaGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mami KayamaGraduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
St. Luke's International University · JPKyorin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of individuals who are diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during adulthood has increased in recent years. However, there is still no decision aid (DA) to help adults newly diagnosed with ADHD make decisions regarding further treatments.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the development process of a DA for adults newly diagnosed with ADHD and its field testing during the shared decision-making (SDM) process in a clinical setting.

methodsThe development process involved the creation of a DA prototype using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria and revision of the prototype through the stakeholders' reviews. The field testing of the DA compared scores before and after the SDM process on the service users' knowledge scale, decisional conflict scale and the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales.

resultsThe developed DA contained options of watchful waiting with own coping skills and pharmacological treatment, which consisted of several kinds of drug options. Fifteen adults newly diagnosed with ADHD participated in the field testing. The participant decision-making quality outcomes such as their knowledge and decisional conflict improved after the SDM process. ADHD severity did not change.

conclusionA DA for adults with ADHD was systematically developed following the international criteria. Field testing indicated that the DA could serve as a tool to facilitate the SDM process. Further research on this DA is necessary before its routine implementation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During the development process of the DA, the service users who had already been diagnosed with ADHD reviewed the DA prototype and provided feedback, which improved the final version of the DA.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAdultDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesHumansKnowledgeattention-deficit hyperactivity disorderdecision aidpre-post testshared decision makingtreatment decision making

Identifiers

PMID34856044
PMCPMC8849269
OpenAlexW3215478284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.