Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34856023›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2022

Trial collaborators' perceptions of the process of delivering Healthy Beginnings advice via telephone calls or text messages.

Mahalakshmi Ekambareshwar, Sarah Taki, Seema Mihrshahi, Louise Baur, Li Ming Wen, Chris Rissel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Trial collaborators' perceptions of the process of delivering Healthy Beginnings advice via telephone calls or text messages.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahalakshmi EkambareshwarNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-7120
Sarah TakiNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Seema MihrshahiNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise BaurNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Li Ming WenNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris RisselNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8581
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

New South Wales Health Translational Research Grant Scheme 2016 TRGS 200Sydney Local Health DistrictUniversity of Sydney Postgraduate Award scheme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedOne in four Australian children aged between the ages of two and four are affected by overweight. In New South Wales, the Communicating Healthy Beginnings Advice by Telephone (CHAT) trial delivered an intervention to pregnant women and women with infants via telephone calls and text messages. The focus of the intervention was on infant feeding and establishing healthy habits for infants by building the capacity of mothers. This study investigates trial collaborators' perspectives concerning the implementation of this intervention, to obtain insights that will support future translation and scale-up.

methodsThis research was undertaken during the intervention phase of the trial. Twenty trial collaborators involved in the planning, implementation or delivery of the CHAT trial were invited to participate. Qualitative interviews were conducted with collaborators using open-ended questions based on Steckler and Linnan's process evaluation framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Inductive thematic analysis was employed to identify themes from the interview data.

resultsFourteen trial collaborators were interviewed. Collaborators included child and family health nurses (intervention providers), nurse managers with extensive child and family health nursing experience, a paediatrician, dietitians, health promotion experts, health service managers, health and nursing executives, program personnel (project coordinator, research fellow and evaluation officer) and university researchers. Following coding of qualitative data, themes were realised from the data as a result of active co-production on the part of the researcher. Five themes were identified: (a) context (organisational support, engagement and partnerships, communication and project leadership); (b) program receipt, benefit and reach; (c) program delivery (intervention providers' experience and skills, mode of intervention delivery, referral to other services, support and training for intervention providers); (d) implementation (program delivered as planned); (e) opportunities for scale-up. Collaborators perceived that the program was implemented and delivered as planned. This specific research addresses the success of the process of implementing and delivering interventions for infant feeding and establishing healthy habits for children by building the capacity of mothers. Collaborators attributed successful program implementation to contextual factors: strong support by the host organisation; good project leadership; clear communication; collaborative internal and external partnerships; intervention provision by experienced nurses. Remote delivery was convenient to program participants and participants were able to resolve other personal concerns in addition to direct immediate benefits. Because of their capacity to influence policy decisions, the absence of policymakers at project meetings was a shortcoming. Collaborative partnerships with health and research partners, understanding of contextual issues and consumer involvement could lead to program expansion. The program has the potential to be scaled up through integration with existing services and gradual expansion into other health districts prior to state-wide rollout.

conclusionsThe CHAT trial delivered the Healthy Beginnings intervention which resulted in improvements in infant feeding, active play and sedentary behaviours. This evaluation demonstrated that the involvement of key stakeholders from early planning stages through to implementation of the program and the partnerships that evolved contributed to the successful implementation of the program. An unintended benefit to participants from this program was the social support that was provided. Intervention delivery via telephone and text messages enabled easy access to the program. Most importantly, the program has the potential to be scaled up through integration into existing services and gradual expansion prior to state-wide rollout. SO WHAT?: Strong internal and external partnerships, effective communication systems and integration with existing services create the context for potential translation and scaling up of the program to other health promotion settings.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAustraliaChildFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMothersPregnancyTelephonehealth promotioninfant obesity preventionprocess evaluationscaling upstakeholder perceptiontelephonetext messages

Identifiers

PMID34856023
PMCPMC9545512
OpenAlexW3216205413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.