Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

ThinPrep cytology combined with HPV detection in the diagnosis of cervical lesions in 1622 patients.

Sulaiya Husaiyin, Zhen Jiao, Kailibinuer Yimamu, Reyilanmu Maisaidi, Lili Han, Mayinuer Niyazi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sulaiya HusaiyinDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Zhen JiaoDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Kailibinuer YimamuDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Reyilanmu MaisaidiDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Lili HanDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Mayinuer NiyaziDepartment of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9575-9105
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timely detection of precancerous lesions and early intervention can greatly reduce cervical cancer occurrence. The current study aimed to assess the diagnostic value and accuracy of different methods of cervical lesion screening. A total of 1622 females who visited the Outpatient Department of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region People's Hospital between January and December 2018 were consecutively enrolled. All participants underwent separate high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) DNA detection, ThinPrep cytology testing (TCT) and colposcopic biopsy. Their medical records were retrospectively analyzed. While considering biopsy outcomes as the gold standard, the diagnostic values of TCT, HR-HPV testing, and TCT+HR-HPV testing for cervical cancer screening were compared. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of each method were calculated. Among the different methods, TCT+HR-HPV testing had the highest sensitivity (89.8%), followed by TCT (79.9%) and HR-HPV testing (49.2%). The combined method also had the highest Youden value, and its screening outcomes exhibited the highest consistency with those of biopsy. In addition, the combined method had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which was 0.673 (0.647, 0.699), compared with any other screening method. Compared with TCT or HR-HPV testing alone, TCT+HR-HPV testing serves as a better screening method for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyChinaCytodiagnosisDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical DysplasiaDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID34855928
PMCPMC8638999
OpenAlexW3215697543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.