Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855882›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Assessing BRCA1 activity in DNA damage repair using human induced pluripotent stem cells as an approach to assist classification of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Meryem Ozgencil, Julian Barwell, Marc Tischkowitz, Louise Izatt, Ian Kesterton, Michael Simpson, Paul Sharpe, Paulo de Sepulveda, Edwige Voisset, Ellen Solomon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Meryem OzgencilDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Julian BarwellDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology at the University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Marc TischkowitzDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Louise IzattClinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ian KestertonCytogenetics Laboratory, Viapath Analytics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michael SimpsonDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Paul SharpeDepartment of Craniofacial Development & Stem Cell Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paulo de SepulvedaSignaling Hematopoiesis and Mechanism of Oncogenesis Lab, INSERM, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8295-5414
Edwige VoissetDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-4847
Ellen SolomonDepartment of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing a universally applicable protocol to assess the impact of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) expression is a problem which has yet to be resolved despite major progresses have been made. The numerous difficulties which must be overcome include the choices of cellular models and functional assays. We hypothesised that the use of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells might facilitate the standardisation of protocols for classification, and could better model the disease process. We generated eight iPS cell lines from patient samples expressing either BRCA1 pathogenic variants, non-pathogenic variants, or BRCA1 VUSs. The impact of these variants on DNA damage repair was examined using a ɣH2AX foci formation assay, a Homologous Repair (HR) reporter assay, and a chromosome abnormality assay. Finally, all lines were tested for their ability to differentiate into mammary lineages in vitro. While the results obtained from the two BRCA1 pathogenic variants were consistent with published data, some other variants exhibited differences. The most striking of these was the BRCA1 variant Y856H (classified as benign), which was unexpectedly found to present a faulty HR repair pathway, a finding linked to the presence of an additional variant in the ATM gene. Finally, all lines were able to differentiate first into mammospheres, and then into more advanced mammary lineages expressing luminal- or basal-specific markers. This study stresses that BRCA1 genetic analysis alone is insufficient to establish a reliable and functional classification for assessment of clinical risk, and that it cannot be performed without considering the other genetic aberrations which may be present in patients. The study also provides promising opportunities for elucidating the physiopathology and clinical evolution of breast cancer, by using iPS cells.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID34855882
PMCPMC8638976
OpenAlexW3215265459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.