Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The early childhood inhibitory touchscreen task: A new measure of response inhibition in toddlerhood and across the lifespan.

Karla Holmboe, Charlotte Larkman, Carina de Klerk, Andrew Simpson, Martha Ann Bell, Leslie Patton, Charis Christodoulou, Henrik Dvergsdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychometric properties of inhibitory control measures among youth with Down syndrome.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging Self-Representation Presents a Challenge When Perspectives Conflict.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karla HolmboeSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3157-6101
Charlotte LarkmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Carina de KlerkDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew SimpsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Martha Ann BellDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Leslie PattonDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Charis ChristodoulouDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Henrik DvergsdalNord University Business School, Department of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Organisation, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

Development of Inhibitory Control during InfancyR03HD091644 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2017 to 2018
$144k
Medical Research Council MR/N008626/1NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD091644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research into the earliest development of inhibitory control is limited by a lack of suitable tasks. In particular, commonly used inhibitory control tasks frequently have too high language and working memory demands for children under 3 years of age. Furthermore, researchers currently tend to shift to a new set of inhibitory control tasks between infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood, raising doubts about whether the same function is being measured. Tasks that are structurally equivalent across age could potentially help resolve this issue. In the current report, a new response inhibition task, the Early Childhood Inhibitory Touchscreen Task (ECITT), was developed. This task can be minimally modified to suit different ages, whilst remaining structurally equivalent. In the new task, participants have to overcome a tendency to respond to a frequently rewarded location on a touchscreen and instead make an alternative response. The ECITT was validated in three independent studies (with additional data, N = 166, reported in Supporting Information). In Study 1 (N = 81), cross-sectional data indicated that inhibitory performance on the task improved significantly between 24 and 30 months of age. In Study 2 (N = 38), longitudinal data indicated steady improvement in inhibitory control between 18, 21 and 24 months, with significant stability in individual performance differences between each consecutive age in terms of accuracy (but not in terms of reaction time). Finally, in Study 3 (N = 64), inhibitory performance on a faster-paced version of the same task showed a similar developmental course across the lifespan (4-84 years) to other response inhibition tasks and was significantly correlated with Stop-signal performance. The ECITT extends the assessment of response inhibition earlier than previous tasks-into early toddlerhood. Because the task is simple and structurally equivalent across age, future longitudinal studies should benefit from using the ECITT to investigate the development of inhibitory control in a consistent manner across the toddler years and beyond.

Indexed as

AdultChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMemory, Short-TermPilot ProjectsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID34855865
PMCPMC8638877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.