Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Vague data analysis using neutrosophic Jarque-Bera test.

Muhammad Aslam, Rehan Ahmad Khan Sherwani, Muhammad Saleem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad AslamDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-1950
Rehan Ahmad Khan SherwaniCollege of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of the Punjab Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad SaleemDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering-Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-0036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In decision-making problems, the researchers' application of parametric tests is the first choice due to their wide applicability, reliability, and validity. The common parametric tests require the validation of the normality assumption even for large sample sizes in some cases. Jarque-Bera test is among one of the methods available in the literature used to serve the purpose. One of the Jarque-Bera test restrictions is the computational limitations available only for the data in exact form. The operational procedure of the test is helpless for the interval-valued data. The interval-valued data generally occurs in situations under fuzzy logic or indeterminate state of the outcome variable and is often called neutrosophic form. The present research modifies the existing statistic of the Jarque-Bera test for the interval-valued data. The modified design and operational procedure of the newly proposed Jarque-Bera test will be useful to assess the normality of a data set under the neutrosophic environment. The proposed neutrosophic Jarque-Bera test is applied and compared with its existing form with the help of a numerical example of real gold mines data generated under the fuzzy environment. The study's findings suggested that the proposed test is effective, informative, and suitable to be applied in indeterminacy compared to the existing Jarque-Bera test.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalFuzzy Logic

Identifiers

PMID34855840
PMCPMC8638977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.