Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855839›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Mentalized affectivity in a nutshell: Validation of the Italian version of the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale (B-MAS).

Marianna Liotti, Grazia Fernanda Spitoni, Vittorio Lingiardi, Antonella Marchetti, Anna Maria Speranza, Annalisa Valle, Elliot Jurist, Guido Giovanardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mentalized Affectivity, Helicopter Parenting, and Psychopathological Risk in Emerging Adults: A Network Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Virtue, well-being, and mentalized affectivity.Research in psychotherapy (Milano) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marianna LiottiDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-4538
Grazia Fernanda SpitoniDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio LingiardiDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonella MarchettiResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria SperanzaDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Annalisa ValleResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Elliot JuristClinical Psychology at the City College of New York, and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-1765
Guido GiovanardiDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-5521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "mentalized affectivity" describes the ability to reflect on, process, modulate and express emotions through the prism of autobiographical memory. It represents a bridge concept that integrates previous contributions on emotion regulation and mentalization, offering a quite unique perspective on affective and reflective functioning. The overall aim of this study was to validate the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale (B-MAS), a 12-items self-report instrument, on the Italian population. We tested both the factorial validity of the instrument and its reliability and convergent validity with other similar constructs. We also obtained normative data for the Italian population, broken down by gender. Participants (n = 389) were recruited through snowball sampling. Data was collected through an online survey. Besides the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale, the survey included an ad hoc schedule with questions investigating socio-demographic characteristics, and self-report measures of empathy and reflective functioning. Statistical analysis has shown a three-component (Identifying, Processing, and Expressing emotions) hierarchical structure underlying mentalized affectivity, mirroring the model already proposed in the original validation of the instrument. Moreover, the B-MAS showed good psychometric properties for what regards both reliability and convergent validity. The results of our study highlight the good operationalization and robust empirical foundation of the construct, revealing that the B-MAS is a promising instrument to assess mentalized affectivity. Its brevity makes it particularly valuable both in clinical and research contexts, and the normative data provided in this study will allow an easy comparison with the scores obtained by other samples (clinical and non-clinical).

Indexed as

MentalizationAdolescentAdultAgedEmotionsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34855839
PMCPMC8639076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.