ArticleJMIR formative research2021
An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Mobile App for Data Collection in Type A Hemophilia: Design and Usability Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04165135 (A Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate Physical Activity, Bleeding Incidence and Health Related Quality of Life, in Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors Receiving Standard of Care Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate Physical Activity, Bleeding Incidence and Health Related Quality of Life, in Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors Receiving Standard of Care Treatment
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Tolerability of aNutrients · 2024Trial
- Co-creation process of an app for people with rare diseases - a citizen science approach.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Physical Activity, Bleedings and Quality of Life in Subjects with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors-A Multicenter, Observational Italian Study with a Wearable Device.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Weight management personas of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China: a multi-method study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Multilingual Framework for Risk Assessment and Symptom Tracking (MRAST).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- User-Centered Development of a Mobile App to Assess the Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer: Iterative Investigation and Usability Testing.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- Empowering People With Haemophilia: A Mobile Solution for Self-Management.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently limited evidence on the level and intensity of physical activity in individuals with hemophilia A. Mobile technologies can offer a rigorous and reliable alternative to support data collection processes but they are often associated with poor user retention. The lack of longitudinal continuity in their use can be partly attributed to the insufficient consideration of stakeholder inputs in the development process of mobile apps. Several user-centered models have been proposed to guarantee that a thorough knowledge of the end user needs is considered in the development process of mobile apps.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to design and validate an electronic patient-reported outcome mobile app that requires sustained active input by individuals during POWER, an observational study that aims at evaluating the relationship between physical activity levels and bleeding in patients with hemophilia A.
methodsWe adopted a user-centered design and engaged several stakeholders in the development and usability testing of this mobile app. During the concept generation and ideation phase, we organized a need-assessment focus group (FG) with patient representatives to elicit specific design requirements for the end users. We then conducted 2 exploratory FGs to seek additional inputs for the app's improvement and 2 confirmatory FGs to validate the app and test its usability in the field through the mobile health app usability questionnaire.
resultsThe findings from the thematic analysis of the need-assessment FG revealed that there was a demand for sense making, for simplification of app functionalities, for maximizing integration, and for minimizing the feeling of external control. Participants involved in the later stages of the design refinement contributed to improving the design further by upgrading the app's layout and making the experience with the app more efficient through functions such as chatbots and visual feedback on the number of hours a wearable device had been worn, to ensure that the observed data were actually registered. The end users rated the app highly during the quantitative assessment, with an average mobile health app usability questionnaire score of 5.32 (SD 0.66; range 4.44-6.23) and 6.20 (SD 0.43; range 5.72-6.88) out of 7 in the 2 iterative usability testing cycles.
conclusionsThe results of the usability test indicated a high, growing satisfaction with the electronic patient-reported outcome app. The adoption of a thorough user-centered design process using several types of FGs helped maximize the likelihood of sustained retention of the app's users and made it fit for data collection of relevant outcomes in the observational POWER study. The continuous use of the app and the actual level of engagement will be evaluated during the ongoing trial.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04165135; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04165135.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.