Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855616›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Chinese-Named Entity Recognition From Adverse Drug Event Records: Radical Embedding-Combined Dynamic Embedding-Based BERT in a Bidirectional Long Short-term Conditional Random Field (Bi-LSTM-CRF) Model.

Hong Wu, Jiatong Ji, Haimei Tian, Yao Chen, Weihong Ge, Haixia Zhang, Feng Yu, Jianjun Zou, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Jun Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A review of recent artificial intelligence for traditional medicine.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hong WuSchool of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0766-9095
Jiatong JiSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1819-5590
Haimei TianSchool of Computer Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-1444
Yao ChenSchool of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-1745
Weihong GeDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5160-7855
Haixia ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-0065
Feng YuSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-8588
Jianjun ZouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-3153
Mitsuhiro NakamuraLaboratory of Drug Informatics, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5062-5522
Jun LiaoSchool of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0617-5840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing variety of drugs, the incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs) is increasing year by year. Massive numbers of ADEs are recorded in electronic medical records and adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports, which are important sources of potential ADR information. Meanwhile, it is essential to make latent ADR information automatically available for better postmarketing drug safety reevaluation and pharmacovigilance.

objectiveThis study describes how to identify ADR-related information from Chinese ADE reports.

methodsOur study established an efficient automated tool, named BBC-Radical. BBC-Radical is a model that consists of 3 components: Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), bidirectional long short-term memory (bi-LSTM), and conditional random field (CRF). The model identifies ADR-related information from Chinese ADR reports. Token features and radical features of Chinese characters were used to represent the common meaning of a group of words. BERT and Bi-LSTM-CRF were novel models that combined these features to conduct named entity recognition (NER) tasks in the free-text section of 24,890 ADR reports from the Jiangsu Province Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center from 2010 to 2016. Moreover, the man-machine comparison experiment on the ADE records from Drum Tower Hospital was designed to compare the NER performance between the BBC-Radical model and a manual method.

resultsThe NER model achieved relatively high performance, with a precision of 96.4%, recall of 96.0%, and F1 score of 96.2%. This indicates that the performance of the BBC-Radical model (precision 87.2%, recall 85.7%, and F1 score 86.4%) is much better than that of the manual method (precision 86.1%, recall 73.8%, and F1 score 79.5%) in the recognition task of each kind of entity.

conclusionsThe proposed model was competitive in extracting ADR-related information from ADE reports, and the results suggest that the application of our method to extract ADR-related information is of great significance in improving the quality of ADR reports and postmarketing drug safety evaluation.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionBERTdeep learningelectronic medical recordsnamed entity recognition

Identifiers

PMID34855616
PMCPMC8686410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.