ArticleJMIR formative research2021
A Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent for a Mental Health Care App: Evaluation Study of Its Participatory Design.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptions of, Barriers to, and Facilitators of the Use of AI in Primary Care: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Attrition in Conversational Agent-Delivered Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- The Analytical Framework of Clinical Trials Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Artificial Intelligence-Based Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Review
- Conditional Acceptance and the Optimism-Knowledge Gap: A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in Italy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Tools in Mental Health Service Delivery: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving adherence to an online intervention for low mood by a virtual coach or personalized motivational feedback messages: A three-arm pilot randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- The Development and Use of AI Chatbots for Health Behavior Change: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The potential impacts of regional artificial intelligence development on depressive symptoms in older adults: evidence from China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Monitoring: A Solution for Digital Behavioral Health Care and Education-An Umbrella Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Clinical System for Mood Disorder Care in Córdoba, Colombia: Participatory Design and Scenario-Based Usability Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Feasibility of an AI-Enabled Smart Mirror Integrating MA-rPPG, Facial Affect, and Conversational Guidance in Realtime.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Loneliness by Design: The Structural Logic of Isolation in Engagement-Driven Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Health Promotion and Disease Reduction: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- A Scoping Review of AI-Driven Digital Interventions in Mental Health Care: Mapping Applications Across Screening, Support, Monitoring, Prevention, and Clinical Education.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Relational ontologies of AI and the technoethics of social isolation in psychosis.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Persuasive chatbot-based interventions for depression: a list of recommendations for improving reporting standards.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Insights From Art Therapists on Using AI-Generated Art in Art Therapy: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Debate and Dilemmas Regarding Generative AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Assessing the Impact of Conversational Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Stress and Anxiety in Aging Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile apps for mental health are available on the market. Although they seem to be promising for improving the accessibility of mental health care, little is known about their acceptance, design methodology, evaluation, and integration into psychotherapy protocols. This makes it difficult for health care professionals to judge whether these apps may help them and their patients.
objectiveOur aim is to describe and evaluate a protocol for the participatory design of mobile apps for mental health. In this study, participants and psychotherapists are engaged in the early phases of the design and development of the app empowered by conversational artificial intelligence (AI). The app supports interventions for stress management training based on cognitive behavioral theory.
methodsA total of 21 participants aged 33-61 years with mild to moderate levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (assessed by administering the Italian versions of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, Occupational Stress Indicator, and Perceived Stress Scale) were assigned randomly to 2 groups, A and B. Both groups received stress management training sessions along with cognitive behavioral treatment, but only participants assigned to group A received support through a mobile personal health care agent, designed for mental care and empowered by AI techniques. Psychopathological outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), after 8 weeks of treatment (T2), and 3 months after treatment (T3). Focus groups with psychotherapists who administered the therapy were held after treatment to collect their impressions and suggestions.
resultsAlthough the intergroup statistical analysis showed that group B participants could rely on better coping strategies, group A participants reported significant improvements in obsessivity and compulsivity and positive distress symptom assessment. The psychotherapists' acceptance of the protocol was good. In particular, they were in favor of integrating an AI-based mental health app into their practice because they could appreciate the increased engagement of patients in pursuing their therapy goals.
conclusionsThe integration into practice of an AI-based mobile app for mental health was shown to be acceptable to both mental health professionals and users. Although it was not possible in this experiment to show that the integration of AI-based conversational technologies into traditional remote psychotherapy significantly decreased the participants' levels of stress and anxiety, the experimental results showed significant trends of reduction of symptoms in group A and their persistence over time. The mental health professionals involved in the experiment reported interest in, and acceptance of, the proposed technology as a promising tool to be included in a blended model of psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.