Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855568›Full record

ReviewThe journal of spinal cord medicine2022

Benefits and interval training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A thematic review.

David R Dolbow, Glen M Davis, Michael Welsch, Ashraf S Gorgey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. On the road to Cybathlon 2024: lessons learned from the Polimi FES-bike team.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David R DolbowDepartment of Physical Therapy and College of Osteopathic Medicine, William Carey University, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.
Glen M DavisClinical Exercise and Rehabilitation Unit, Discipline of Exercise and Sports Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Michael WelschSchool of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Ashraf S GorgeySpinal Cord Injury & Disorders Center, Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USWilliam Carey University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArm crank ergometry (ACE), functional electrical stimulation leg cycling exercise (FES-LCE), and the combination of the two (FES hybrid exercise) have all been used as activities to help improve the fitness-related health of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). More recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has become popular in the non-disabled community due to its ability to produce greater aerobic fitness benefits or equivalent benefits with reduced time commitment.

objectiveThis thematic review of the literature sought to determine the potential benefits and practicality of using ACE, FES-LCE, and FES hybrid exercise in an interval training format for individuals with SCI.

methodsSystematic literature searches were conducted in May 2020 and March 2021 focusing on interval training in individuals with SCI. Pre-defined nested search terms were used to narrow the available literature from 4273 citations to 1362 articles. The titles and abstracts were then reviewed to determine the appropriateness of the articles ending with fifteen articles.

resultsThe literature was limited to fifteen articles with low participant numbers (n = 1-20). However, in each article, HIIT protocols either demonstrated a greater improvement in cardiovascular, metabolic, or practicality scores compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) protocols, or improvement during relatively brief time commitments.

conclusionThe available literature lacked sufficient numbers of randomized control trials. However, the available evidence is encouraging concerning the potential benefits and practicality of using HIIT (ACE, FES-LCE, or FES hybrid exercise) to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity and decrease cardiometabolic risk after SCI.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapySpinal Cord InjuriesExerciseExercise TestExercise TherapyHumansArm crank ergometryFunctional electrical stimulation cyclingHigh-intensity interval trainingHybrid exerciseSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID34855568
PMCPMC9135438
OpenAlexW3216083392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.