Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855467›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2021

Long-Term Exposure to Transportation Noise and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in a Nationwide Cohort Study from Denmark.

Jesse D Thacher, Aslak H Poulsen, Ulla A Hvidtfeldt, Ole Raaschou-Nielsen, Jørgen Brandt, Camilla Geels, Jibran Khan, Thomas Münzel, Mette Sørensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perspectives on environment and health research in Denmark.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jesse D ThacherDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-9715
Aslak H PoulsenDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4456-4169
Ulla A HvidtfeldtDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-4838
Ole Raaschou-NielsenDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-0909
Jørgen BrandtDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7580-9547
Camilla GeelsDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Jibran KhanDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-2871
Thomas MünzelCenter for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-4150
Mette SørensenDiet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic studies have linked transportation noise to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly for cardiovascular outcomes. However, studies investigating metabolic outcomes such as diabetes are limited and have focused only on noise exposures estimated for the loudest residential façade.

objectivesWe aimed to examine the influence of long-term residential exposure to transportation noise at the loudest and quietest residential façades and the risk for type 2 diabetes.

methodsRoad traffic and railway noise exposures (Lden) at the most and least exposed façades were estimated for all dwellings in Denmark during 1990-2017. Aircraft noise was estimated in 5-dB categories. Ten-year time-weighted mean noise exposures were estimated for

resultsHazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for type 2 diabetes in association with 10-dB increases in 10-y mean road traffic noise at the most and least exposed façades, respectively, were 1.05 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.05) and 1.09 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.10). Following subsequent adjustment for fine particulate matter [particulate matter DISCUSSION: Long-term exposure to road, railway, and possibly aircraft traffic noise was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in a nationwide cohort of Danish adults. Our findings suggest that diabetes should be included when estimating the burden of disease due to transportation noise. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9146.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Noise, TransportationAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkEnvironmental ExposureHumans

Identifiers

PMID34855467
PMCPMC8638828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.