Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855236›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2022

Affective states and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI): Results from an ecological momentary assessment study of veterans with NSSI disorder.

Kirsten H Dillon, Jeffrey J Glenn, Paul A Dennis, Adam J Mann, Charlene A Deming, Natalie Aho, Jeffrey S Hertzberg, Bryann B DeBeer, Eric C Meyer, Sandra B Morissette and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsten H DillonDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jeffrey J GlennDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Paul A DennisDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adam J MannDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Charlene A DemingDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Natalie AhoDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jeffrey S HertzbergDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Bryann B DeBeerVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas, USA.
Eric C MeyerVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas, USA.
Sandra B MorissetteUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Kim L GratzUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Paul J SilviaUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Patrick S CalhounDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jean C BeckhamDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nathan A KimbrelDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-1005
Duke University · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USDurham VA Health Care System · USMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

Nonsuicidal Self Injury in VeteransI01CX001486 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KIMBREL, NATHAN A. · 2017 to 2021
–
Developing a Mobile Intervention for Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Problematic AngerIK2RX002965 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DILLON, KIRSTEN HAWKINS · 2019 to 2023
–
CSR&D Research Career Scientist AwardIK6BX003777 · VA · DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BECKHAM, JEAN C. · 2017 to 2023
–
BLRD VA IK6 BX003777CSRD VA I01 CX001486ORD VA 1K6BX003777ORD VA I01CX001486RRD VA IK2 RX002965RRD VA IK2RX002965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe affective states most strongly associated with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) remain poorly understood, particularly among veterans. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine relationships between affect ratings and NSSI urges and behaviors among veterans with NSSI disorder.

methodsParticipants (N = 40) completed EMA entries via mobile phone for 28 days (3722 total entries). Entries included intensity ratings for five basic affective states, as well as NSSI urges and behaviors, during the past 4 hours.

resultsBivariate analyses indicated that each affect variable was significantly associated with both NSSI urges and behaviors. Angry/hostile and sad were most strongly associated with both NSSI urges and behaviors. A multivariate regression revealed that angry/hostile, disgusted with self, and happy (inversely related) were contemporaneously (within the same period) associated with NSSI behaviors, whereas all five basic affective states were contemporaneously associated with NSSI urges. In a lagged model, angry/hostile and sad were associated with subsequent NSSI urges but not behaviors.

conclusionsFindings highlight the relevance of particular affective states to NSSI and the potential utility of targeting anger in treatments for NSSI among veterans. There is a need for future EMA research study to further investigate temporal relationships between these variables.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorVeteransAngerEcological Momentary AssessmentEmotionsHumansecological momentary assessmentemotionmoodnonsuicidal self-injuryveterans

Identifiers

PMID34855236
PMCPMC8995315
OpenAlexW3215657298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.