Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855126›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2022

Stable Deep Neural Network Architectures for Mitochondria Segmentation on Electron Microscopy Volumes.

Daniel Franco-Barranco, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia, Ignacio Arganda-Carreras

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Densely Populated Cell and Organelles Segmentation with U-Net Ensembles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Franco-BarrancoDonostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. daniel_franco001@ehu.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-110X
Arrate Muñoz-BarrutiaUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-1661
Ignacio Arganda-CarrerasDonostia International Physics Center (DIPC), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-5722
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESIkerbasque · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy (EM) allows the identification of intracellular organelles such as mitochondria, providing insights for clinical and scientific studies. In recent years, a number of novel deep learning architectures have been published reporting superior performance, or even human-level accuracy, compared to previous approaches on public mitochondria segmentation datasets. Unfortunately, many of these publications make neither the code nor the full training details public, leading to reproducibility issues and dubious model comparisons. Thus, following a recent code of best practices in the field, we present an extensive study of the state-of-the-art architectures and compare them to different variations of U-Net-like models for this task. To unveil the impact of architectural novelties, a common set of pre- and post-processing operations has been implemented and tested with each approach. Moreover, an exhaustive sweep of hyperparameters has been performed, running each configuration multiple times to measure their stability. Using this methodology, we found very stable architectures and training configurations that consistently obtain state-of-the-art results in the well-known EPFL Hippocampus mitochondria segmentation dataset and outperform all previous works on two other available datasets: Lucchi++ and Kasthuri++. The code and its documentation are publicly available at https://github.com/danifranco/EM_Image_Segmentation .

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerHumansMicroscopy, ElectronMitochondriaReproducibility of ResultsBioimage analysisDeep learningElectron microscopyMitochondriaSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34855126
PMCPMC9546980
OpenAlexW3144402300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.