ArticleRadiological physics and technology2022
Echo-planar imaging is superior to fast spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging for cranioplasty using titanium mesh in brain magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visualization of small vibrations inside an MRI scanner using video motion amplification.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Assessing the radiofrequency shielding effect of titanium mesh on diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of the twice-refocused spin-echo and Stejskal-Tanner sequences.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Can magnetic resonance imaging after cranioplasty using titanium mesh detect brain tumors?Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the radiofrequency (RF) shielding effects of titanium mesh of echo-planar imaging (EPI) versus fast spin-echo (FSE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to establish a suitable sequence for patients who undergo cranioplasty and for whom titanium mesh was used in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 1.5-T MRI scanner with clinical setting sequences was used. A phantom for the examination constructed using a sucrose solution in a plastic container was used to compare the signal attenuation (SA) ratio, area of RF shielding effect (Area), normalized absolute average deviation (NAAD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between EPI and FSE-DWI. EPI provided significantly better SA ratio, Area, and NAAD (P < 0.01). When the number of slices increased, the RF shielding became more negative. There was no significant difference in the ADC. Regardless of the k-trajectory, EPI-DWI had a lower RF shielding effect than FSE-DWI in patients undergoing cranioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34855114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.