Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855072›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2022

Value appropriation in hepatitis C.

Peter Lindgren, Sofia Löfvendahl, Gunnar Brådvik, Ola Weiland, Bengt Jönsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter LindgrenDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. peter.lindgren@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-8189
Sofia LöfvendahlThe Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7988-757X
Gunnar BrådvikThe Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden.
Ola WeilandDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-9724
Bengt JönssonStockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Swedish Institute for Health Economics · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm School of Economics · SESwedish Institute · SE

Funding

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond P16-0112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015, the Swedish government in an unprecedented move decided to allocate 150 million € to provide funding for new drugs for hepatitis C. This was triggered by the introduction of the first second generation of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) promising higher cure rates and reduced side effects. The drugs were cost-effective but had a prohibitive budget impact. Subsequently, additional products have entered the market leading to reduction in prices and expansions of the eligible patient base.

methodsWe estimated the social surplus generated by the new DAAs in Stockholm, Sweden, for the years 2014-2019. The actual use and cost of the drugs was based on registry data. Effects on future health care costs, indirect costs and QALY gains were estimated using a Markov model based primarily on Swedish data and using previous generations of interferon-based therapies as the counterfactual.

resultsA considerable social surplus was generated, 15% of which was appropriated by the producers whose share fell rapidly over time as prices fell. Most of the consumer surplus was generated by QALY gains, although 10% was from reduced indirect costs. QALY gains increased less rapidly than the number of treated patients as the eligibility criteria was loosened.

conclusionsThe transfer of funds from the government to the regions helped generate substantial surplus for both consumers and producers with indirect costs playing an important role. The funding model may serve as a model for the financing of innovative treatments in the future.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisHepacivirusHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntiviral AgentsConsumer surplusCost-effectivenessHepatitis CPharmaceutical reimbursementProducer surplus

Identifiers

PMID34855072
PMCPMC9304061
OpenAlexW3214861188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.