Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855069›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2022

Association of opioid fills with centers for disease control and prevention opioid guidelines and payer coverage policies: physician, insurance and geographic factors.

Adeniyi T Togun, Pinar Karaca Mandic, Rebecca Wurtz, Molly Moore Jeffery, Timothy Beebe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adeniyi T TogunDivision of Health Services Research, Policy & Administration, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, US. niyitogun@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-5234
Pinar Karaca MandicOptumLabs® Visiting Fellow, Minneapolis, US.
Rebecca WurtzDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, US.
Molly Moore JefferyDepartment of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, US.
Timothy BeebeDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, US.
University of Minnesota · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USOptum (United States) · US

Funding

Medical reversals: De-implementing ineffective and unsafe treatmentsR01HS025164 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KARACA-MANDIC, PINAR · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidelines and certain healthcare payers have made pharmacy coverage changes (PCC) focusing on regulating prescription opioids. Aim We evaluated differences in the rate of first-time opioid fills at doses ≥ 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day and first-time opioid fills with benzodiazepine fill overlap following the CDC guidelines and following a PCC between provider types, geographic locations, and insurance types. Method We used OptumLabs® Data Warehouse claims data between 2014 and 2018. Subjects were opioid naïve non-cancer care patients, 18 years and older who had an identified chronic pain condition ICD diagnosis within 2 weeks prior to their first-time opioid fill. We used multiple treatment period segmented regression analysis with interaction terms to test the differences between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialist providers (SPs), urban and rural primary care service areas (PCSAs), and Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercially insured patients (CIPs) in their first-time opioid fill patterns. Results Prescribing first-time opioid fills at doses ≥ 50MME/day declined following the CDC guidelines and PCC, the decline was greater among SPs than PCPs and in rural PCSAs than urban PCSAs. Also, following the CDC guidelines, the decline was greater among MA patients however following the PCC the decline was greater among CIPs. There were no differences in rate of first-time opioid fill with benzodiazepine overlap between groups. Conclusion Responses to the CDC opioid guidelines and a PCC differed between PCPs and SPs, urban and rural PCSAs, and when prescribing to MA and CIPs. Understanding these differences is important to help inform future guidelines.

Indexed as

InsurancePhysiciansAgedAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Drug PrescriptionsGeographyHumansMedicarePolicyPractice Patterns, Physicians'United StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesCDC opioid guidelinesInsurance type and geographyOpioidsPayer coverage changeProvider specialty

Identifiers

PMID34855069
PMCPMC8636786
OpenAlexW3215228356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.