ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022
Extensive suppuration and being overweight are factors associated with the failure of laser treatment for pilonidal disease: lessons from the first French retrospective cohort.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07557589 (Radiofrequency Treatment for Pilonidal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Radiofrequency Treatment for Pilonidal Disease : Clinical Investigation on Safety of Use, Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction at 6 Months
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of sinus laser associated closure (SiLaC) versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in the management of pilonidal sinus disease.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Karydakis Versus Limberg Flap in Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Functional Recovery.World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- Early postoperative outcomes of sinus laser closure versus crystallized phenol treatment for pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective comparative study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Radiofrequency for the treatment of pilonidal disease: results of a French prospective pilot study.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Sinus laser-assisted closure for pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective single-center study.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Future of pilonidal cyst surgery: a comparative review of traditional and laser techniques.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Sinus laser therapy versus Karydakis flap procedure in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Minimum energy laser pilonidotomy (MELPi): a multicenter study of a novel method in pilonidal disease.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) for the treatment of pilonidal disease.
methodsAll adult patients treated with SiLaT in our department between June 1, 2018, and August 23, 2019, were included in the study. Success was defined as the closure of cutaneous orifices and the absence of discharge or abscesses.
resultsWe included 29 consecutive patients (22 males) with a median age of 32.5 ± 10.5 years. Eight patients had already undergone prior surgery for pilonidal disease. The procedure was performed under spinal (55%) or general (45%) anesthesia. The mean follow-up was 370.3 days (± 165.8 days). We observed 2 primary failures (6.9%) and 7 recurrences (24.1%). Ultimately, 20 patients were considered to have been cured (69%). The mean time to healing was 25 days (± 8.1 days). No serious complications were reported. Usual activities were resumed within a mean of 4.9 days (± 7.2), and 86% of patients reported being "very satisfied" with the treatment. The body mass index was lower for patients who were cured (24.0 ± 3.6) than for those who experienced treatment failure (27.6 ± 3.4; p = 0.018). The cured patients were less likely to have one or more secondary openings (35.0 versus 88.9%, p = 0.014).
conclusionsAlmost 70% of our patients were cured by SiLaT. Complications were rare and mild. The technique appeared to be less effective for overweight patients and those with one or more secondary openings associated with pilonidal pits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.