Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855018›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Captivity and habituation to humans raise curiosity in vervet monkeys.

Sofia Ingrid Fredrika Forss, Alba Motes-Rodrigo, Pooja Dongre, Tecla Mohr, Erica van de Waal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  4. Effects of Socialization on Problem Solving in Domestic Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Behavioral flexibility and its drivers in semi-urban vervet monkeys.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  14. Beyond the Lab: Cognitive Neuroscience in Real-World Contexts.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia Ingrid Fredrika ForssDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. sofia.forss@ieu.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-1907
Alba Motes-RodrigoDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pooja DongreDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tecla MohrDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Erica van de WaalDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

schweizerischer nationalfonds zur förderung der wissenschaftlichen forschung PP00P3_170624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive mechanisms causing intraspecific behavioural differences between wild and captive animals remain poorly understood. Although diminished neophobia, resulting from a safer environment and more "free" time, has been proposed to underlie these differences among settings, less is known about how captivity influences exploration tendency. Here, we refer to the combination of reduced neophobia and increased interest in exploring novelty as "curiosity", which we systematically compared across seven groups of captive and wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) by exposing them to a test battery of eight novel stimuli. In the wild sample, we included both monkeys habituated to human presence and unhabituated individuals filmed using motion-triggered cameras. Results revealed clear differences in number of approaches to novel stimuli among captive, wild-habituated and wild-unhabituated monkeys. As foraging pressure and predation risks are assumed to be equal for all wild monkeys, our results do not support a relationship between curiosity and safety or free time. Instead, we propose "the habituation hypothesis" as an explanation of why well-habituated and captive monkeys both approached and explored novelty more than unhabituated individuals. We conclude that varying levels of human and/or human artefact habituation, rather than the risks present in natural environments, better explain variation in curiosity in our sample of vervet monkeys.

Indexed as

Animals, WildExploratory BehaviorAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsHabituation, PsychophysiologicHumansPredatory BehaviorCaptivity biasCaptivity effectCuriosityExplorationHuman habituationNeophobiaNovelty response

Identifiers

PMID34855018
PMCPMC9107434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.