Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34855002›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2022

Detection of acute rib fractures on CT images with convolutional neural networks: effect of location and type of fracture and reader's experience.

Minako Azuma, Hiroshi Nakada, Mizuki Takei, Keigo Nakamura, Shigehiko Katsuragawa, Norihiro Shinkawa, Tamasa Terada, Rie Masuda, Youhei Hattori, Takakazu Ide and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A deep learning-based approach to automated rib fracture detection and CWIS classification.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Minako AzumaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan. minako_azuma@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-4197
Hiroshi NakadaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Mizuki TakeiFUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Keigo NakamuraFUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigehiko KatsuragawaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Teikyo University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Norihiro ShinkawaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Tamasa TeradaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Rie MasudaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Youhei HattoriDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Takakazu IdeDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Aya KimuraDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Mei ShimomuraDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Masatsugu KawanoDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Kengo MatsumuraDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Takayuki MeiriDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Hidenobu OchiaiCenter for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Toshinori HiraiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe evaluation of all ribs on thin-slice CT images is time consuming and it can be difficult to accurately assess the location and type of rib fracture in an emergency. The aim of our study was to develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm for the detection of acute rib fractures on thoracic CT images and to investigate the effect of the CNN algorithm on radiologists' performance.

methodsThe dataset for development of a CNN consisted of 539 thoracic CT scans with 4906 acute rib fractures. A three-dimensional faster region-based CNN was trained and evaluated by using tenfold cross-validation. For an observer performance study to investigate the effect of CNN outputs on radiologists' performance, 30 thoracic CT scans (28 scans with 90 acute rib fractures and 2 without rib fractures) which were not included in the development dataset were used. Observer performance study involved eight radiologists who evaluated CT images first without and second with CNN outputs. The diagnostic performance was assessed by using figure of merit (FOM) values obtained from the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis.

resultsWhen radiologists used the CNN output for detection of rib fractures, the mean FOM value significantly increased for all readers (0.759 to 0.819, P = 0.0004) and for displaced (0.925 to 0.995, P = 0.0028) and non-displaced fractures (0.678 to 0.732, P = 0.0116). At all rib levels except for the 1st and 12th ribs, the radiologists' true-positive fraction of the detection became significantly increased by using the CNN outputs.

conclusionThe CNN specialized for the detection of acute rib fractures on CT images can improve the radiologists' diagnostic performance regardless of the type of fractures and reader's experience. Further studies are needed to clarify the usefulness of the CNN for the detection of acute rib fractures on CT images in actual clinical practice.

Indexed as

Rib FracturesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiologistsRibsTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional neural network (CNN)Fresh rib fracturesThoracic CTTrauma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.