Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854965›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2021

[Generations Y and Z-New challenges for hospital leadership].

Reiner M Waeschle, Christian Schmidt, Antje-Britta Mörstedt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reiner M WaeschleKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Deutschland. rwaeschle@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Christian SchmidtVorstand, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
Antje-Britta MörstedtPräsidium, PFH, Private University of Applied Science, Göttingen, Deutschland.
PFH Private University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn this study medical students of the generations Y and Z at the Georg-August University Göttingen were asked about their preferences in the workplace and the choice of an employer. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn 2016, the survey was sent to 2637 students at the University Medical Center Göttingen using an online questionnaire via EvaSys and was answered by 742 (response rate: 28.1%).

resultsRegardless of the generation, with 89.5% the respondents felt predominantly "well" and "not so well" prepared for the transition from university to professional life. The most common fears were a lot of work/little free time, lack of time in patient care, lack of experience, stress, excessive technical demands and poor familiarization. In both groups almost 60% obtained information about future employers via the hospital's website. It was important for the students to have a particularly good education and a structured induction/advanced training curriculum.

conclusionThe further development of a structured induction concept for young professionals, a binding and structured further training curriculum, the establishment or further development of a mentoring program, the further development of leadership skills and the design of an appealing and updated website are essential prerequisites for future success in the highly competitive skilled labor market.

Indexed as

LeadershipStudents, MedicalCurriculumHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEmployee managementGenerationLabor marketPersonnel developmentYoung professionals

Identifiers

PMID34854965
PMCPMC8637038
OpenAlexW3217041155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.