Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854934›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury.

Andrew C Smith, Claudia A Angeli, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Kenneth A Weber, Robert J Bert, Mohammadjavad Negahdar, Samineh Mesbah, Maxwell Boakye, Susan J Harkema, Enrico Rejc

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05966896 (Epidural Stimulation to Restore Voluntary Movement Following Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05966896 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Epidural Stimulation to Restore Voluntary Movement Following Spinal Cord Injury: Spared Fibers Proof-of-concept Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2026 to 2027Enrolled2ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsimplanted epidural stimulator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew C SmithDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Claudia A AngeliKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Beatrice UgiliwenezaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Kenneth A WeberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Robert J BertDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Mohammadjavad NegahdarDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Samineh MesbahKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Maxwell BoakyeKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Susan J HarkemaKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Enrico RejcKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. enrico.rejc@louisville.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-2220

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
MRI and machine learning to improve early prognosis and clinical management after spinal cord injuryR03HD094577 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SMITH, ANDREW CRAIG · 2019 to 2020
$195k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD094577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) is an intervention to restore motor function in those with severe spinal cord injury (SCI). Spinal cord lesion characteristics assessed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may contribute to understand motor recovery. This study assessed relationships between standing ability with scES and spared spinal cord tissue characteristics at the lesion site. We hypothesized that the amount of lateral spared cord tissue would be related to independent extension in the ipsilateral lower limb. Eleven individuals with chronic, clinically motor complete SCI underwent spinal cord MRI, and were subsequently implanted with scES. Standing ability and lower limb activation patterns were assessed during an overground standing experiment with scES. This assessment occurred prior to any activity-based intervention with scES. Lesion hyperintensity was segmented from T2 axial images, and template-based analysis was used to estimate spared tissue in anterior, posterior, right, and left spinal cord regions. Regression analysis was used to assess relationships between imaging and standing outcomes. Total volume of spared tissue was related to left (p = 0.007), right (p = 0.005), and bilateral (p = 0.011) lower limb extension. Spared tissue in the left cord region was related to left lower limb extension (p = 0.019). A positive trend (p = 0.138) was also observed between right spared cord tissue and right lower limb extension. In this study, MRI measures of spared spinal cord tissue were significantly related to standing outcomes with scES. These preliminary results warrant future investigation of roles of supraspinal input and MRI-detected spared spinal cord tissue on lower limb motor responsiveness to scES.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationEpidural SpaceHumansSpinal CordStanding PositionEpidural stimulationSpinal cord injurySpinal cord lesionSpinal cord MRIStanding

Identifiers

PMID34854934
PMCPMC9469645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.