Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854904›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Variability in Reassessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction in the Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance Canada Study.

Stephen B Wilton, Matthew T Bennett, Ratika Parkash, Katherine Kavanagh, E Marc Jolicoeur, Frank Halperin, Umjeet Jolly, Peter Leong-Sit, Rozsa Sas, Derek S Chew and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What's in Your Serial?CASE (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen B WiltonLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthew T BennettDivision of Cardiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ratika ParkashDivision of Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Katherine KavanaghLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
E Marc JolicoeurCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Frank HalperinDivision of Cardiology, Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Umjeet JollyDivision of Cardiology, St Mary's General Hospital, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
Peter Leong-SitDivision of Cardiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rozsa SasLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Derek S ChewLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sarah SinghDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie FrisbeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Robert MacLachlanPatient partner, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jaimie ManlucuDivision of Cardiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality Assurance (AMIQA) Canada Investigators
University of Calgary · CAWestern University · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CADalhousie University · CAKelowna General Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Persistently depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with adverse prognosis and directs the use of evidence-based treatments to prevent sudden cardiac death and/or progressive heart failure. Objective: To assess adherence with guideline-recommended LVEF reassessment and to study the evolution of LVEF over 6 months of follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter cohort study at Canadian academic and community hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization services. Patients with type 1 acute MI and LVEF less than or equal to 45% during the index hospitalization were enrolled between January 2018 and August 2019 and were followed-up for 6 months. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to September 2021. Exposures: Baseline clinical factors, in-hospital care and LVEF, and site-specific features. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were receipt of repeat LVEF assessment by 6 months and the presence of a persistent LVEF reduction at 2 thresholds: LVEF less than or equal to 40%, prompting consideration of additional medical therapy for heart failure, or LVEF less than or equal to 35%, prompting referral for implanted cardioverter defibrillator in addition to medical therapy. Results: This study included 501 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [13.0] years; 113 women [22.6%]). Overall, 370 patients (73.4%) presented with STEMI, and 454 (90.6%) had in-hospital revascularization. The median (IQR) baseline LVEF was 40% (34%-43%). Of 458 patients (91.4%) who completed the 6-month follow-up, 303 (66.2%; 95% CI, 61.7%-70.5%) had LVEF reassessment, with a range of 46.7% to 90.0% across sites (χ213 = 19.6; P = .11). Participants from community hospitals were more likely than those from academic hospitals to undergo LVEF reassessment (73.6% vs 63.2%; χ21 = 4.50; P = .03), as were those with worse LVEF at baseline. Follow-up LVEF improved by an absolute median (IQR) of 8% (3%-15%). However, 103 patients (34.1%) met the definitions of clinically relevant LVEF reduction, including 52 patients (17.2%) with LVEF less than or equal to 35% and 51 patients (16.9%) with LVEF of 35.1% to 40.0%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, approximately 1 in 3 patients with at least mild LVEF reduction after acute MI did not undergo indicated LVEF reassessment within 6 months, suggesting that programs to improve the quality of post-MI care should include measures to ensure that indicated repeat cardiac imaging is performed. In those with follow-up imaging, clinically relevant persistent LVEF reduction was identified in more than one-third of patients.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeCanadaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPrognosisRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID34854904
PMCPMC8640891
OpenAlexW3217111132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.