Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854770›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2021

The prognostic value of the lactate/albumin ratio for predicting mortality in septic patients presenting to the emergency department: a prospective study.

Ralphe Bou Chebl, Mirabelle Geha, Mohamad Assaf, Nadim Kattouf, Saadeddine Haidar, Karim Abdeldaem, Nour Halawi, Mohamed Khamis, Maha Makki, Hani Tamim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers in Septic Critically Ill Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Retrospective Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ralphe Bou CheblDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mirabelle GehaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamad AssafDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nadim KattoufDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Saadeddine HaidarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Karim AbdeldaemDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nour HalawiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamed KhamisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Maha MakkiDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-0457
Hani TamimDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-4362
Gilbert Abou DagherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLactate/albumin (L/A) ratio is a biomarker in sepsis that has been shown to outperform lactate. This prospective study aims to validate the superior prognostic value of the L/A ratio to lactate in sepsis and septic shock.

methodsProspective cohort conducted from September 2018 till February 2021 on adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) at a tertiary care centre with sepsis or septic shock. The primary outcome was the prognostic value of the L/A ratio compared to lactate with regards to mortality.

resultsA total of 939 septic patients were included throughout the study period. A total of 236 patients developed septic shock. The AUC value of the L/A ratio in septic patients was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.70) and was higher than that of lactate alone 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64) with a

conclusionsThe L/A ratio is a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate in sepsis patients. This superiority was not found in the septic shock subgroup. Our results encourage the use of the ratio early in the ED as a superior prognostic tool in sepsis patients.Key messagesWe aimed to assess the prognostic usefulness of the Lactate/Albumin ratio compared to lactate alone in septic and septic shock patients.The L/A ratio proved to be a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate alone in sepsis patients. This pattern also applies across various subgroups in our study (malignancy, diabetics, age above 65, lactate level less than 2 mmol/L, albumin less than 30 g/L). Our results favour the use of the L/A ratio over lactate alone in patients with sepsis and the previously mentioned subgroups.Our results do not favour the use of the ratio instead of lactate in septic shock patients as there was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of the ratio and lactate alone.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAdultAlbuminsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLactic AcidPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAlbuminsLactic Acidalbuminemergency medicineinfectionlactatelactate/albuminmortalityOutcomeprognosissepsis

Identifiers

PMID34854770
PMCPMC8648034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.