ReviewMicrosurgery2022
Management of postoperative microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer: Retrospective review of 2103 flaps.
Review in Microsurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06523920 (Protecting Autologous Free Flaps From Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage With Cold Storage), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Protecting Autologous Free Flaps From Ischemia/Reperfusion Damage With Cold Storage: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technique-Driven and Patient-Specific Variations in Complications of Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Evidence-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Balancing Risk and Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Complications in Delayed Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical Burden of Breast Cancer Treatment: Implications of Mastectomy, Breast Conservation, and Reconstruction Choices.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Flap Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Lower limb varicose veins in free fibula flap reconstruction: a surgical case report and scoping review.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Free Flap Salvage Using Extracorporeal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration: A Comparative Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Evidence-based Algorithms for Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Exosomes: the future of acellular nanotherapeutics in regenerative vascularization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Comparisons of Impact of Vein Grafting with Different Indications on Outcomes of Reconstruction with Free Flaps.Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 2024Article
- The Use of Fibrinolytic Agents in the Salvage of Free Flaps: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Reliability of Long Vein Grafts for Reconstruction of Massive Wounds.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Improving the ischemia-reperfusion injury in vascularized composite allotransplantation: Clinical experience and experimental implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough rates of microvascular thrombosis following free-flap breast reconstruction are low, debate persists about the optimal methods to restore blood flow and prevent ensuing flap shrinkage or fibrosis. Here we evaluate our management of microvascular compromise, including both a review of our approach for restoring blood flow and addressing the ensuing inflammatory changes following ischemia reperfusion.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of autologous free tissue transfer breast reconstructions from 1/2010 to 1/2020. Patients who had flaps requiring take-back for salvage were identified. Management of microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury were recorded.
resultsOf 2103 flaps were used in the breast reconstructions, 47 flaps required take-back for microvascular compromise (2.2%). Most flaps were either completely salvaged (n = 29, 61.7%) or partially salvaged (n = 5, 10.6%). Thirteen (27.7%) were a total flap loss, for an overall rate of 0.8% (including 3 flaps with no salvage attempt). Management of microvascular compromise most often included revision of the anastomosis (n = 33, 70.2%), thrombectomy (n = 27, 57.4%), tissue plasminogen activator administration (n = 26, 55.3%), and vein grafts (n = 18, 38.3%). Management of ischemia reperfusion included intraoperative steroids (n = 33, 70.2%), postoperative steroids (n = 17, 38.6%), and postoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (n = 27, 61.3%). Of 34 salvaged flaps, 5 (14.7%) had partial flap loss and/or fat necrosis on clinical examination at an average follow-up of 2.7 ± 2.8 years.
conclusionsSalvage of microvascular compromise in autologous breast reconstruction should include restoration of blood flow and management of ischemia reperfusion injury. Attention to both is paramount for successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.