Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854427›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2021

Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler.

Anjuna Reghunath, Mahesh Kumar Mittal, Chintamani Chintamani, Rajni Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anjuna ReghunathDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Mahesh Kumar MittalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Chintamani ChintamaniDepartment of Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Rajni PrasadDepartment of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectives: Ultrasound BI-RADS categories 3 and 4 constitute those breast masses which cannot be confidently classified as benign or malignant, owing to their morphological characteristics. These masses are further managed by follow up and biopsy, respectively. This study aims to evaluate the role of strain elastography and Doppler in better characterization of these sonographically indeterminate breast masses as benign or malignant.

methods: Fifty female patients with ultrasound BI-RADS 3 or 4 were evaluated with strain elastography and color Doppler including spectral analysis. Eight variables were assessed by elastography and Doppler, including a new phenomenon called bidirectional arterial flow (BAF). The findings were correlated with the gold standard diagnostic method of histopathology/cytology. Based on findings of combined elastography and Doppler method, the initial ultrasound BI-RADS categories of masses were re-categorized by up-gradation or down-gradation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to estimate the diagnostic performance of the combination method.

results: Using ROC analysis, the positivity of ≥3 among the total eight variables correlated with malignancy on histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the combination method using cut-off score ≥3 (i.e. at least three out of the eight parameters in the combination method being positive) for the prediction of malignancy was 100, 76.47 and 92 per cent, respectively, with the area under curve being 0.967. In addition, BAF was found predictive of malignancy with a diagnostic accuracy of 70 per cent. INTERPRETATION &

conclusions: This non-invasive, cheaper and readily accessible combination method of strain elastography and Doppler imaging can improve the diagnostic characterization of sonographically indeterminate breast masses and may obviate the need of magnetic resonance imaging and unnecessary biopsies, thus proving helpful in resource-poor countries.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesBreastFemaleHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, MammaryBidirectional arterial flowBI-RADSbreastDopplerelastographysize ratiostrain ratioTsukuba score

Identifiers

PMID34854427
PMCPMC9131756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.