Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854269›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2021

Development of a multiplex qRT-PCR assay for detection of African swine fever virus, classical swine fever virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Yating Chen, Kaichuang Shi, Huixin Liu, Yanwen Yin, Jing Zhao, Feng Long, Wenjun Lu, Hongbin Si

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yating Chen *College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-960X
Kaichuang Shi *College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1023-9635
Huixin LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-1209
Yanwen YinGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-2080
Jing ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-7542
Feng LongGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-0527
Wenjun LuGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-045X
Hongbin SiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China. shb2009@gxu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-6150
Guangxi University · CNGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CN

Funding

Guangxi Agricultural and Rural Bureau Z201954Guangxi Agricultural and Rural Bureau Z202031Scientific Research and Technology Development Program of Guangxi AA17204057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican swine fever virus (ASFV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) are still prevalent in many regions of China. Co-infections make it difficult to distinguish their clinical symptoms and pathological changes. Therefore, a rapid and specific method is needed for the differential detection of these pathogens.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a multiplex real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (multiplex qRT-PCR) for the simultaneous differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV.

methodsThree pairs of primers and TaqMan probes targeting the ASFV p72 gene, CSFV 5' untranslated region, and PRRSV ORF7 gene were designed. After optimizing the reaction conditions, including the annealing temperature, primer concentration, and probe concentration, multiplex qRT-PCR for simultaneous and differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV was developed. Subsequently, 1,143 clinical samples were detected to verify the practicality of the assay.

resultsThe multiplex qRT-PCR assay could specifically and simultaneously detect the ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV with a detection limit of 1.78 × 10

conclusionsThe multiplex qRT-PCR developed in this study could provide a rapid, sensitive, specific diagnostic tool for the simultaneous and differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV.

Indexed as

African Swine Fever VirusClassical Swine Fever VirusPorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusAnimalsChinaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSwineAfrican swine fever virusclassical swine fever virusmultiplex real-time quantitative RT-PCR (multiplex qRT-PCR)porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Identifiers

PMID34854269
PMCPMC8636662
OpenAlexW3205440159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.