Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854241›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2022

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response modeling analyses of guselkumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Yang Chen, Xin Miao, Chyi-Hung Hsu, Yanli Zhuang, Alexa Kollmeier, Zhenhua Xu, Honghui Zhou, Amarnath Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang ChenClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Xin MiaoClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chyi-Hung HsuClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yanli ZhuangClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexa KollmeierImmunology Clinical Research, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, California, USA.
Zhenhua XuClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Honghui ZhouClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amarnath SharmaClinical Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USSpringhouse · USJanssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guselkumab is an anti-interleukin-23 human monoclonal antibody effective in treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and exposure-response relationship of guselkumab in PsA, population PKs, and exposure-response modeling, analyses were conducted using data from pivotal phase III studies of subcutaneous guselkumab in patients with PsA. The observed serum concentration-time data of guselkumab were adequately described by a one-compartment linear PK model with first-order absorption and elimination. Covariates identified as contributing to the observed guselkumab PK variability were body weight and diabetes comorbidity; however, the magnitude of the effects of these covariates was not considered clinically relevant, and dose adjustment was not warranted for the patient population investigated. Positive exposure-response relationships were demonstrated with landmark and longitudinal exposure-response analyses between guselkumab exposure and clinical efficacy end points (American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement criteria and Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] of psoriasis) at weeks 20 and/or 24, with no clinically relevant differences observed in improvement of PsA signs and symptoms between the two guselkumab treatment regimens evaluated (100 mg every 4 weeks or 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks). Baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and/or C-reactive protein level were identified as influencing covariates on guselkumab exposure-response model parameters. These results provide a comprehensive evaluation of subcutaneous guselkumab PKs and exposure-response relationship that supports the dose regimen of 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks in patients with PsA.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticPsoriasisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedguselkumab

Identifiers

PMID34854241
PMCPMC8932692
OpenAlexW3217086810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.