Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854190›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.

Kimberly Manalili, Fartoon M Siad, Marichu Antonio, Bonnie Lashewicz, Maria J Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Operationalising Patient Engagement Through the Alberta Cancer Diagnosis Initiative: Recruitment Strategies for Diverse Populations in Health System Improvement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Laboratory-based inequity in thrombosis and hemostasis: review of the evidence.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Quality Indicators in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberly ManaliliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-7298
Fartoon M SiadDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marichu AntonioActionDignity, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bonnie LashewiczDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Maria J SantanaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0202-5952

Funding

CIHR 201709PJTCIHR 201810CGV
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective engagement of underrepresented communities in health research and policy remains a challenge due to barriers that hinder participation. Our study had two objectives: (1) identify themes of person-centred care (PCC) from perspectives of diverse patients/caregivers that would inform the development of person-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs) for evaluating the quality of PCC and initiatives to improve PCC and (2) explore innovative participatory approaches to engage ethnocultural communities in qualitative research.

methodsDrawing on participatory action research methods, we partnered with a community-based organization to train six 'Community Brokers' from the Chinese, Filipino, South Asian, Latino-Hispanic, East African and Syrian communities, who were engaged throughout the study. We also partnered with the provincial health organization to engage their Patient and Family Advisory, who represented further aspects of diversity. We conducted focus group discussions with patients/caregivers to obtain their perspectives on their values, preferences and needs regarding PCC. We identified themes through our study and engaged provincial stakeholders to prioritize these themes for informing the development of PC-QIs and codesign initiatives for improving PCC.

resultsEight focus groups were conducted with 66 diverse participants. Ethnocultural communities highlighted themes related to access and cost of care, language barriers and culture, while the Patient and Family Advisory emphasized patient and caregiver engagement. Together with provincial stakeholders, initiatives were identified to improve PCC, such as codesigning innovative models of training and evaluation of healthcare providers.

conclusionIncorporating patient and community voices requires addressing issues related to equity and understanding barriers to effective and meaningful engagement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public engagement was central to our research study. This included partnership with a community-based organization, with a broad network of ethnocultural communities, as well as the provincial health service delivery organization, who both facilitated the ongoing engagement of diverse patients/caregiver communities throughout our study including designing the study, recruiting participants, collecting and organizing data, interpreting findings and mobilizing knowledge. Drawing from participatory action research methods, patients and the public were involved in the codesign of the PC-QIs and initiatives to improve PCC in the province based on the findings from our study.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationQuality Indicators, Health CareFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative Researchcodesigndiverse communitiesparticipatory action researchpatient engagementperson-centred carequalitative researchquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID34854190
PMCPMC9615079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.